NIMG-03. RADIOMIC TEXTURE ANALYSIS TO PREDICT RESPONSE TO IMMUNOTHERAPY. (5th November 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- NIMG-03. RADIOMIC TEXTURE ANALYSIS TO PREDICT RESPONSE TO IMMUNOTHERAPY. (5th November 2018)
- Main Title:
- NIMG-03. RADIOMIC TEXTURE ANALYSIS TO PREDICT RESPONSE TO IMMUNOTHERAPY
- Authors:
- Colen, Rivka
Hassan, Ahmed
Elshafeey, Nabil
Zinn, Pascal
Heimberger, Amy
de Groot, John - Abstract:
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: Radiomic texture analysis (TA) from standard MRI imaging may be able to discriminate between responders versus non-responders in glioblastoma patients treated with pembrolizumab immunotherapy. METHODS: 14 patients (5 males; mean age 58 years; range: 32–72 years), with pathologically-proven recurrent GBM, enrolled in a pembrolizumab clinical trial, were retrospectively evaluated. Immunotherapy Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology(iRANO) were performed. Patients were categorized based on: 1) best response or 2) overall response (OR) using the iRANO status at the last scan time in the trial. Patients with progressive disease (PD) were classified as non-responders, while patients with partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) were classified as responders. T2-FLAIR (edema/invasion) and post-contrast T1WI (enhancing tumor) of baseline scans were co-registered and segmented (3D Slicer, v.4.3.1) to create a volume of interest for Radiomic TA. A total of 4880 texture features were extracted. Feature selection was performed using Lasso regularization. For classification and predictive model building, gbtree booster of XGboost with Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) was used on the selected texture features to build a binary logistic regression model and classify the patients into respective groups<.strong> RESULTS: Using the best response classification, 10 patients were classified as non-responders and four patients classified as responders (1 SD; 3Abstract: BACKGROUND: Radiomic texture analysis (TA) from standard MRI imaging may be able to discriminate between responders versus non-responders in glioblastoma patients treated with pembrolizumab immunotherapy. METHODS: 14 patients (5 males; mean age 58 years; range: 32–72 years), with pathologically-proven recurrent GBM, enrolled in a pembrolizumab clinical trial, were retrospectively evaluated. Immunotherapy Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology(iRANO) were performed. Patients were categorized based on: 1) best response or 2) overall response (OR) using the iRANO status at the last scan time in the trial. Patients with progressive disease (PD) were classified as non-responders, while patients with partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) were classified as responders. T2-FLAIR (edema/invasion) and post-contrast T1WI (enhancing tumor) of baseline scans were co-registered and segmented (3D Slicer, v.4.3.1) to create a volume of interest for Radiomic TA. A total of 4880 texture features were extracted. Feature selection was performed using Lasso regularization. For classification and predictive model building, gbtree booster of XGboost with Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) was used on the selected texture features to build a binary logistic regression model and classify the patients into respective groups<.strong> RESULTS: Using the best response classification, 10 patients were classified as non-responders and four patients classified as responders (1 SD; 3 PR). Using 13 radiomic features, these patients could be classified into their respective responding groups with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%, p-value=0.0089. Based on OR, 12 patients were classified as non-responders and two as responders (2 SD). Seven features were able to differentiate the responding patients with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%, p-value=0.0089. CONCLUSION: Radiomic TA was able to discriminate and predict those GBM patients that are responders versus non-responders to pembrolizumab with high robustness. Of note, given the small number of patients in this cohort, a larger cohort of patients is needed to minimize overfitting. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neuro-oncology. Volume 20(2018)Supplement 6
- Journal:
- Neuro-oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 20(2018)Supplement 6
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 6 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0020-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- vi176
- Page End:
- vi176
- Publication Date:
- 2018-11-05
- Subjects:
- Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals
Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99481 - Journal URLs:
- http://neuro-oncology.dukejournals.org/ ↗
http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/content?genre=journal&issn=1522-8517 ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/neuonc/noy148.732 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1522-8517
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.288000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12326.xml