P01.052 Updated results of the INTELLANCE 2/EORTC trial 1410 randomized phase II study on Depatux -M alone, Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) and either TMZ or lomustine (LOM) in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma (NCT02343406). (19th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: van den Bent, M; French, P; Eoli, M; Sepulvado, J; Walenkamp, A; Weller, M; Looman, J; Ansell, P; Gorlia, T; Golfinopoulos, V
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology. Volume 20(2018)Supplement 3
• Page Start: iii241
• Page End: iii241
• Publication Date: 2018-09-19
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481
• DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy139.094
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-8517

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Depatux-M is a n antibody-drug-conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) specific to the activated conformation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) bound to the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. In the primary analysis on EORTC 1410 we reported a trend (p = 0.06) towards improved overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-amplified recurrent glioblastoma treated with Depatux-M in combination with TMZ. We now present updated results. Material and Methods: Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR-amplified glioblastoma at 1st recurrence after TMZ chemo-irradiation, occurring ≥3 months after radiotherapy. Patients were randomized to either a) Depatux-M 1.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or b) the same treatment combined with TMZ 150–200 mg/m 2 day 1–5 every 4 weeks, or c) either LOM or TMZ (TMZ/LOM) depending on the time of relapse. Primary endpoint was OS. Pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was done on day (d) 1 before and after dosing, d 4–7, d 1 course 2 before and after dosing, d 5–7 course 2, d 1 course 3, and then every 2 cycles. All available PK samples were used to calculate the Depatux-M average concentration during course 1 (CavgC1). The level of EGFR amplification was determined using both qPCR, next generation sequencing and FISH. Results: In February 2018, an updated OS comparison with longer follow-up (median: 21 mo) performed after 220 observed deaths of Depatux-M in combination with TMZ versus TMZ/LOM using log-rank test and cox models stratified by stratification factors at randomization showed a HR of 0.68 (95%CI [0.48, 0.95]; p = 0.024) and 1-year OS rates of 40% versus 28%. In multivariate analysis including performance status, MGMT, surgery for recurrence, time from last TMZ to relapse and lesion diameter, CavgC1 was a significant predictor for OS (HR 0.96, 95% CI [0.93, 0.98], p = 0.0013). In Depatux-M treated patients, EGFR status (high vs low level amplification) did not correlate with OS. At the meeting further follow-up data will be presented obtained at database cleaning done > 24 months after the end of accrual allowing definitive analysis. Conclusion: This updated OS analysis confirmed the OS improvement in EGFR-amplified recurrent glioblastoma after treatment with of Depatux-M in combination with TMZ. In Depatux-M treated patients, higher drug levels during course 1 were associated with improved OS but high levels of EGFR amplification at first diagnosis were not.