MBCL-29. FEASIBILITY OF SCREENING AND REASONS FOR SCREENING FAILURES IN THE SIOPE PNET 5 MB TRIAL. Issue 2 (22nd June 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- MBCL-29. FEASIBILITY OF SCREENING AND REASONS FOR SCREENING FAILURES IN THE SIOPE PNET 5 MB TRIAL. Issue 2 (22nd June 2018)
- Main Title:
- MBCL-29. FEASIBILITY OF SCREENING AND REASONS FOR SCREENING FAILURES IN THE SIOPE PNET 5 MB TRIAL
- Authors:
- Doz, François
Clifford, Steven
Pietsch, Torsten
Avula, Shivaram
Mynarek, Martin
Riechers, Regine
Benesch, Martin
Gerber, Nicolas U
Massimino, Maura
Sabel, Magnus
Jacobs, Sandra
Ariza, Miguel Garcia
Michalski, Antony
Sterba, Jaroslav
Pentikäinen, Virve
Rutkowski, Stefan - Abstract:
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: Current medulloblastoma treatment must take into account bio-pathological risk-categories. The ongoing European PNET 5 MB trial for standard risk medulloblastoma comprises two sub-studies: a LR (low-risk) arm for WNT-medulloblastoma and a SR (standard-risk) arm for non-anaplastic/LCA, non-WNT-medulloblastoma without MYCN or MYC amplification. Submission of frozen tumor sample is mandated for this biomarker-based patient stratification. Pre-screening also includes pathological and imaging review. METHODS: We investigated all pre-screened standard-risk medulloblastoma patients (i.e. excluding those diagnosed locally with residual or metastatic disease*) and reasons for non-inclusion in the LR or SR arm. RESULTS: 235 standard-risk medulloblastoma patients from 11 countries were pre-screened. Reasons for non-inclusion (130) were: imaging review demonstrating metastatic disease (12*), or surgical residue above 1.5 cm 2 (12), histology review demonstrating anaplastic or LCA-MB (31), unavailability of frozen tumor tissue (24), biological criteria demonstrating high risk factors MYCN or MYC amplification (17), randomization refusal in the SR-arm (13), or other (21). 105 of 235 patients (45%) of screened patients have been included into the PNET 5 MB trial per 31 Aug 2017. CONCLUSION: Histopathological review, frozen sample collection, biological pre-inclusion-assessments, and radiological review are feasible within 28 days of surgery, allowing inclusion of aAbstract: BACKGROUND: Current medulloblastoma treatment must take into account bio-pathological risk-categories. The ongoing European PNET 5 MB trial for standard risk medulloblastoma comprises two sub-studies: a LR (low-risk) arm for WNT-medulloblastoma and a SR (standard-risk) arm for non-anaplastic/LCA, non-WNT-medulloblastoma without MYCN or MYC amplification. Submission of frozen tumor sample is mandated for this biomarker-based patient stratification. Pre-screening also includes pathological and imaging review. METHODS: We investigated all pre-screened standard-risk medulloblastoma patients (i.e. excluding those diagnosed locally with residual or metastatic disease*) and reasons for non-inclusion in the LR or SR arm. RESULTS: 235 standard-risk medulloblastoma patients from 11 countries were pre-screened. Reasons for non-inclusion (130) were: imaging review demonstrating metastatic disease (12*), or surgical residue above 1.5 cm 2 (12), histology review demonstrating anaplastic or LCA-MB (31), unavailability of frozen tumor tissue (24), biological criteria demonstrating high risk factors MYCN or MYC amplification (17), randomization refusal in the SR-arm (13), or other (21). 105 of 235 patients (45%) of screened patients have been included into the PNET 5 MB trial per 31 Aug 2017. CONCLUSION: Histopathological review, frozen sample collection, biological pre-inclusion-assessments, and radiological review are feasible within 28 days of surgery, allowing inclusion of a comprehensively screened cohort of patients, as planned in the study. An amendment for upfront prospective subgrouping of all medulloblastoma samples, and constitutional genetic testing in SHH-MB and in WNT-MB without somatic CTNNB1 mutation will be implemented in 2018. *No results from Germany included, as reports on local assessments of metastatic disease are not yet available. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neuro-oncology. Volume 20:Issue 2(2018)supplement 2
- Journal:
- Neuro-oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 20:Issue 2(2018)supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0020-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- i122
- Page End:
- i123
- Publication Date:
- 2018-06-22
- Subjects:
- Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals
Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99481 - Journal URLs:
- http://neuro-oncology.dukejournals.org/ ↗
http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/content?genre=journal&issn=1522-8517 ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/neuonc/noy059.425 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1522-8517
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.288000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12323.xml