Controls on gross production in an aspen–sagebrush vegetation mosaic. Issue 1 (12th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fellows, Aaron W.; Flerchinger, Gerald N.; Seyfried, Mark S.; Lohse, Kathleen A.; Patton, Nicholas R.
• Is Part Of: Ecohydrology. Volume 12:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2018-10-12
• Subjects: aspen–sagebrush vegetation mosaic gross ecosystem exchange -- critical zone -- Great Basin carbon cycle -- rain use efficiency; Ecohydrology -- Periodicals; Hydrology -- Periodicals; Water -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 577.6
• DOI: 10.1002/eco.2046
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1936-0584

Abstract

Abstract: The critical zone (CZ; defined as the zone between the top of the vegetation canopy and the groundwater) mediates the impact of precipitation amount and timing on water availability and plant productivity. However, CZ structure, including soil and subsurface properties, are almost always unknown, leading to considerable uncertainty in the links between precipitation, plant water availability, and gross production. Using multiyear records of gross ecosystem CO2 exchange (GEE), micrometeorology, and streamflow, we examined the sensitivity of GEE to environmental controls in a sagebrush shrubland and an aspen forest. The sites were within 500 m of each other and had similar precipitation and temperature but marked differences in CZ structure. Cumulative growing season GEE was approximately two times greater at the aspen compared with the sagebrush, underscoring the importance of CZ properties in structuring spatial "hot spots" for carbon cycling. Larger soil water holding capacity and topography that produced lateral subsurface flow to the aspen enabled marked difference in plant functional type. Annual variability in growing season GEE within each site was not driven by annual precipitation; this lack of relationship was attributed to the CZ's limited ability to store water and an associated increase in water yield. Instead, both seasonal timing and cumulative growing season GEE for the sagebrush varied with spring and summer rain, whereas aspen GEE responded to spring snowpack conditions. These results emphasized how mapping and understanding CZ structure will help predict the spatial variability in plant functional type and temporal sensitivity of growing season GEE.