Design and evaluation of an additively manufactured aircraft heat exchanger. (25th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Saltzman, David; Bichnevicius, Michael; Lynch, Stephen; Simpson, Timothy W.; Reutzel, Edward W.; Dickman, Corey; Martukanitz, Richard
• Is Part Of: Applied thermal engineering. Volume 138(2018)
• Page Start: 254
• Page End: 263
• Publication Date: 2018-06-25
• Subjects: Heat engineering -- Periodicals; Heating -- Equipment and supplies -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 621.40205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.04.032
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1359-4311

Abstract

Highlights: Additive manufacturing successful in replicating aircraft oil cooler geometry. Significant surface roughness but good resolution of heat exchange features. Pressure drop high on additively manufactured parts due to surface roughness. Heat transfer enhanced by up to 15% for additively manufactured part. Abstract: Additive manufacturing (AM) technology has significant potential to improve heat exchanger (HX) performance through incorporation of novel geometries and materials, but there is limited understanding of AM HX functionality relative to conventionally manufactured components. This study compares the performance of conventionally-built plate-fin air–liquid crossflow heat exchangers (i.e., aircraft oil coolers) to additively manufactured heat exchangers of similar geometry. To replicate internal features, three dimensional X-ray computed tomography scans were performed on the conventionally-built heat exchanger. A baseline AM model of the conventional design was designed, as well as an AM model with additional enhancement features on the air side. The two AM heat exchanger geometries were constructed using a laser-based powder bed fusion process with AlSi10Mg aluminum-alloy powder. Visual inspection of the as-built AM HX indicated significant surface roughness and some cracks in the fin-tube joint, but only at the edges of the heat exchanger. Overall heat transfer was increased by about 10 percent for the baseline AM and by 14 percent for the enhanced AM heat exchanger when compared to the conventionally built baseline heat exchanger. Measured air-side pressure drop for the AM heat exchangers was double that of the conventionally built baseline heat exchanger. Overall, this study indicates potential for improved heat transfer and demonstrated functionality of AM HX in realistic applications.