A comparison of four radionuclide dose calibrators using various radionuclides and measurement geometries clinically used in nuclear medicine. (April 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comparison of four radionuclide dose calibrators using various radionuclides and measurement geometries clinically used in nuclear medicine. (April 2019)
- Main Title:
- A comparison of four radionuclide dose calibrators using various radionuclides and measurement geometries clinically used in nuclear medicine
- Authors:
- Bauwens, Matthias
Pooters, Ivo
Cobben, Rianda
Visser, Mariëlle
Schnerr, Roald
Mottaghy, Felix
Wildberger, Joachim
Wierts, Roel - Abstract:
- Highlights: Radionuclide calibrator measurement error exceeds international guidelines. All investigated radionuclide calibrators overestimate the 68 Ga activity by 10–20%. The measured 111 In activity is strongly affected by the measurement geometry. Deviations up to 50% are found between radionuclide calibrator systems. Abstract: Purpose: Reliable quantification of radioactivity in nuclear medicine is becoming increasingly important in various therapeutic applications requiring a high accuracy of nuclear medicine measuring equipment, such as radionuclide calibrators. In this study the accuracy of four different radionuclide calibrators was assessed for 99m Tc, 111 In, 68 Ga and 18 F for measurement geometries clinically used. Methods: Syringes and vials were prepared with a reference activity using a stock solution of which the activity concentration was determined using gamma-ray spectroscopy. The accuracy of four different radionuclide calibrator systems, ISOMED 2000, ISOMED 2010, VIK-202 and Capintec CRC-25R, was assessed by comparing the measured activity to the reference activity. Results: Deviations in measured activity from reference values were found up to 12.5%, 32.0%, 29.0% and 12.6% for 99m Tc, 111 In, 68 Ga and 18 F, respectively. For 68 Ga all radionuclide calibrators systematically overestimated the activity by 10–20%. For 111 In, large differences in activity measurements were observed between different source geometries, in particular between syringes andHighlights: Radionuclide calibrator measurement error exceeds international guidelines. All investigated radionuclide calibrators overestimate the 68 Ga activity by 10–20%. The measured 111 In activity is strongly affected by the measurement geometry. Deviations up to 50% are found between radionuclide calibrator systems. Abstract: Purpose: Reliable quantification of radioactivity in nuclear medicine is becoming increasingly important in various therapeutic applications requiring a high accuracy of nuclear medicine measuring equipment, such as radionuclide calibrators. In this study the accuracy of four different radionuclide calibrators was assessed for 99m Tc, 111 In, 68 Ga and 18 F for measurement geometries clinically used. Methods: Syringes and vials were prepared with a reference activity using a stock solution of which the activity concentration was determined using gamma-ray spectroscopy. The accuracy of four different radionuclide calibrator systems, ISOMED 2000, ISOMED 2010, VIK-202 and Capintec CRC-25R, was assessed by comparing the measured activity to the reference activity. Results: Deviations in measured activity from reference values were found up to 12.5%, 32.0%, 29.0% and 12.6% for 99m Tc, 111 In, 68 Ga and 18 F, respectively. For 68 Ga all radionuclide calibrators systematically overestimated the activity by 10–20%. For 111 In, large differences in activity measurements were observed between different source geometries, in particular between syringes and vials. Deviations between radionuclide calibrator systems were found up to 11.8%, 44.4%, 14.4% and 8.7% for 99m Tc, 111 In, 68 Ga and 18 F, respectively. When comparing similar syringe types of different brands filled with identical stock solution volume, deviations up to 1.8%, 5.8%, 10.2% and 3.2% were found for 99m Tc, 111 In, 68 Ga and 18 F. Conclusion: Substantial deviations in measured activity were found for all radionuclides and radionuclide calibrators, which may result in erroneous activity dosing and image quantification. This underlines the importance of thorough validation of radionuclide calibrators for all measurement geometries and radionuclides clinically used. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Physica medica. Volume 60(2019)
- Journal:
- Physica medica
- Issue:
- Volume 60(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 60, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 60
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0060-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 14
- Page End:
- 21
- Publication Date:
- 2019-04
- Subjects:
- Nuclear medicine -- Radionuclide -- Radionuclide calibrator
Medical physics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques
Physique -- Périodiques
Médecine -- Périodiques
610.153 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.physicamedica.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.012 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1120-1797
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6475.070000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12290.xml