Comparative efficacy of two interventions to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use: cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. (June 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative efficacy of two interventions to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use: cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. (June 2014)
- Main Title:
- Comparative efficacy of two interventions to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use: cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care
- Authors:
- Vicens, Caterina
Bejarano, Ferran
Sempere, Ermengol
Mateu, Catalina
Fiol, Francisca
Socias, Isabel
Aragonès, Enric
Palop, Vicente
Beltran, Jose Luis
Piñol, Josep Lluís
Lera, Guillem
Folch, Silvia
Mengual, Marta
Basora, Josep
Esteva, Magdalena
Llobera, Joan
Roca, Miguel
Gili, Margalida
Leiva, Alfonso - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Benzodiazepines are extensively used in primary care, but their long-term use is associated with adverse health outcomes and dependence. Aims: To analyse the efficacy of two structured interventions in primary care to enable patients to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use. Method: A multicentre three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted, with randomisation at general practitioner level (trial registration ISRCTN13024375). A total of 532 patients taking benzodiazepines for at least 6 months participated. After all patients were included, general practitioners were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to usual care, a structured intervention with follow-up visits (SIF) or a structured intervention with written instructions (SIW). The primary end-point was the last month self-declared benzodiazepine discontinuation confirmed by prescription claims at 12 months. Results: At 12 months, 76 of 168 (45%) patients in the SIW group and 86 of 191 (45%) in the SIF group had discontinued benzodiazepine use compared with 26 of 173 (15%) in the control group. After adjusting by cluster, the relative risks for benzodiazepine discontinuation were 3.01 (95% CI 2.03–4.46, P <0.0001) in the SIW and 3.00 (95% CI 2.04–4.40, P <0.0001) in the SIF group. The most frequently reported withdrawal symptoms were insomnia, anxiety and irritability. Conclusions: Both interventions led to significant reductions in long-term benzodiazepine use in patients without severeAbstract : Background: Benzodiazepines are extensively used in primary care, but their long-term use is associated with adverse health outcomes and dependence. Aims: To analyse the efficacy of two structured interventions in primary care to enable patients to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use. Method: A multicentre three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted, with randomisation at general practitioner level (trial registration ISRCTN13024375). A total of 532 patients taking benzodiazepines for at least 6 months participated. After all patients were included, general practitioners were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to usual care, a structured intervention with follow-up visits (SIF) or a structured intervention with written instructions (SIW). The primary end-point was the last month self-declared benzodiazepine discontinuation confirmed by prescription claims at 12 months. Results: At 12 months, 76 of 168 (45%) patients in the SIW group and 86 of 191 (45%) in the SIF group had discontinued benzodiazepine use compared with 26 of 173 (15%) in the control group. After adjusting by cluster, the relative risks for benzodiazepine discontinuation were 3.01 (95% CI 2.03–4.46, P <0.0001) in the SIW and 3.00 (95% CI 2.04–4.40, P <0.0001) in the SIF group. The most frequently reported withdrawal symptoms were insomnia, anxiety and irritability. Conclusions: Both interventions led to significant reductions in long-term benzodiazepine use in patients without severe comorbidity. A structured intervention with a written individualised stepped-dose reduction is less time-consuming and as effective in primary care as a more complex intervention involving follow-up visits. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of psychiatry. Volume 204:Number 6(2014)
- Journal:
- British journal of psychiatry
- Issue:
- Volume 204:Number 6(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 204, Issue 6 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 204
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0204-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 471
- Page End:
- 479
- Publication Date:
- 2014-06
- Subjects:
- Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Psychology, Pathological -- Periodicals
616.89005 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00002405-000000000-00000 ↗
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry ↗
http://bjp.rcpsych.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.134650 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1250
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 12283.xml