356 Assessment of Sampling Technique of Swine Diets on Analytical Variation. (10th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jones, A M; Woodworth, J C; Vahl, C I; Tokach, M D; Dritz, S S; DeRouchey, J M; Goodband, B D
• Is Part Of: Journal of animal science. Volume 96(2018)Supplement 2
• Page Start: 192
• Page End: 192
• Publication Date: 2018-04-10
• Subjects: calcium -- copper -- diet sampling; Livestock -- Periodicals; Livestock; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 636.005
• DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky073.353
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8812

Abstract

Abstract: This study was designed to evaluate different sampling procedures and number of samples to collect from feeders within a swine facility to achieve an accurate assessment of nutrient fortification in swine diets. Treatments were arranged in a split-plot design with whole-plots receiving 1 of 6 concentrations of dietary Cu (27 to 147 mg/kg total Cu included in the diet) and subplots sampled with 1 of 2 techniques (probe vs. hand grab). A total of 6 feeders per dietary treatment were sampled using a 1.6 m brass open handle probe (Seedburo Equipment Company, Des Plaines, IL), which contained 10 openings spaced approximately 5 cm apart. The probe was inserted into the feeder on average 4 times to obtain ~ 900 g of sample. Alternatively, samples were simply collected by inserting a bare hand into the feeder approximately 8 times to obtain the ~900 g sample. Within a feeder and sampling technique, subsamples (~200 g) were created by using a sample splitter. In addition to the 6 individual feeder samples, a subsample (~33 g) from each individual feeder was pooled within dietary treatment and sampling technique to form a single composite sample. This process was repeated until 4 individual composite samples were created for each diet and sampling technique. All samples were ground through a centrifugal mill and submitted for mineral analysis in duplicate. Results indicated that the variability when sampling feeders with an open handle probe was reduced ( P= 0.013) for Cu and marginally reduced ( P= 0.058) for Ca when compared with hand-sampling. There was no evidence for differences detected among sampling techniques when samples were pooled from 6 feeders to form a single composite sample. From these results, sampling frequency calculations were determined to assess sampling accuracy within a 95% confidence interval. Results indicated that the number of feeders or composite samples required to analyze was less when using a probe compared to hand collection. In summary, these results suggest that sampling with a probe is associated with less variability when analyzing individual feeder samples; however, this difference was not evident when pooling individual samples to form a composite sample. In addition, using a probe to obtain complete feed from swine feeders and pooling of individually collected samples reduces variability in analyzed nutrient results leading to a need for fewer replicate samples analyzed, which will help reduce analytical costs.