How much difference in type-approval CO2 emissions from passenger cars in Europe can be expected from changing to the new test procedure (NEDC vs. WLTP)?. (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pavlovic, J.; Ciuffo, B.; Fontaras, G.; Valverde, V.; Marotta, A.
• Is Part Of: Transportation research. Volume 111(2018)
• Page Start: 136
• Page End: 147
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: CO2 emissions -- Vehicle type-approval -- NEDC -- WLTC -- WLTP -- Correlation; Transportation -- Research -- Periodicals; 388.011
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0965-8564

Abstract

Abstract: After significant efforts from many parties, the World-wide harmonized Light duty Test Procedure (WLTP) has seen its light first as the UNECE Global Technical Regulation and then as the procedure adopted in the type-approval of light-duty vehicles in Europe. The paper focuses its attention on the main procedural differences between the WLTP and the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), which is the test-procedure currently used in Europe. In general terms the WLTP appears to be a significant improvement compared to the NEDC. The main differences between two test procedures are identified and their impact on CO2 emissions quantified using the in-house built simulation software CO2 MPAS. On the basis of each of these differences, the paper assesses the potential total impact on the final reported type-approval CO2 emissions. The biggest impact on CO2 emissions is coming from the changes in the road load determination procedure (∼10% increase). Procedural changes concerning the test in the laboratory will bring another 8% and post-processing and declaration of results will result in difference of approximately 5% (each). Overall, the WLTP is likely to increase the type-approval CO2 emissions by approximately 25%. Therefore, the WLTP will be able to reduce more than half of the gap identified between the type-approval and real-life figures in Europe. This should be seen as a considerable improvement given the ontological limitations of a laboratory-based test procedure.