Continuous monitoring after atrial fibrillation ablation: the LINQ AF study. Issue Volume 20:Issue FI 3(2018) (24th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wechselberger, Simon; Kronborg, Mads; Huo, Yan; Piorkowski, Judith; Neudeck, Sebastian; Päßler, Ellen; El-Armouche, Ali; Richter, Utz; Mayer, Julia; Ulbrich, Stefan; Pu, Liying; Kirstein, Bettina; Gaspar, Thomas; Piorkowski, Christopher
• Is Part Of: Europace. Volume 20:Issue FI 3(2018)
• Page Start: f312
• Page End: f320
• Publication Date: 2018-04-24
• Subjects: Atrial fibrillation -- Ablation -- Monitoring -- Outcome -- Burden -- Telemedicine; Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Catheter ablation -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euy038
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-5129

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: To study device performance, arrhythmia recurrence characteristics, and methods of outcome assessment using a novel implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results: In 419 consecutive patients undergoing first-time catheter ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal ( n = 224) or persistent ( n = 195) AF an ICM was injected at the end of the procedure. Telemedicine staff ensured full episode transmission coverage and manually evaluated all automatic arrhythmia episodes. Device detection metrics were calculated for ≥2, ≥6, and ≥10 min AF detection durations. Four methods of outcome assessment were studied: continuous recurrence analysis, discontinuous recurrence analysis, AF-burden analysis, and analysis of individual rhythm profiles. A total of 43 673 automatic AF episodes were transmitted over a follow-up of 15 ± 6 months. Episode-based positive predictive values changed significantly with longer AF detection durations (70.5% for ≥2 min, 81.8% for ≥6 min, and 85.9% for ≥10 min). Patients with exclusive short episode recurrences (≥2 to <6 min) were rare and their arrhythmia detection was clinically irrelevant. Different methods of outcome assessment showed a large variation (46–79%) in ablation success. Individual rhythm characteristics and subclinical AF added to this inconsistency. Analysis of AF-burden and individual rhythm profiles were least influenced and showed successful treatment in 60–70% of the patients. Conclusion: We suggest AF detection duration >6 min and AF burden >0.1% as a standardized outcome definition for AF studies to come in the future.