A47 LONG-TERM CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT FOR SMALL BOWEL VACULAR LESIONS BY DOUBLE BALLOON ENDOSCOPY. (1st March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hansen, T; Teshima, C W
• Is Part Of: Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Volume 1(2018)Supplement 1
• Page Start: 80
• Page End: 81
• Publication Date: 2018-03-01
• Subjects: Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33005
• DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwy008.048
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2515-2084

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Balloon-assisted endoscopy (BAE) has revolutionized the approach to obscure GI bleeding (OGIB) by enabling the diagnosis and treatment of bleeding sources from within the small bowel. The most common source of OGIB is small bowel vascular lesions (SBVL), and referring physicians and patients often anticipate a definitive cure once these have been endoscopically treated. The literature has predominantly focused on immediate diagnostic and therapeutic yields with relatively little attention paid to clinically meaningful outcomes. Therefore, the durability of endoscopic therapy to SBVL by BAE remains unclear. Aims: This meta-analysis aimed to address this question by determining the risk of rebleeding in long-term follow-up after endoscopic intervention to SBVL. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, OVID, Medline and EMBASE was performed to identify studies reporting long-term clinical outcomes after endoscopic therapy for small bowel sources of OGIB via double balloon endoscopy, single balloon endoscopy or spiral enteroscopy. Original studies that identified patients receiving endoscopic treatment to SBVL and that reported objective measures of rebleeding such as overt bleeding signs, repeat hospitalization or intervention for OGIB and/or changes in hemoglobin levels or transfusion requirements were included. A minimum of 6 months follow up was required for study inclusion. Studies were selected using 2 independent and blinded reviewers followed by assessment of study quality. Data were extracted and then analyzed to determine the weighted pooled risk of rebleeding after successful endoscopic therapy. Results: A literature search to April 1, 2016 yielded 1951 unique citations. After initial abstract screening, 30 articles were identified for full text review. Ultimately, 9 studies were selected for inclusion, comprising 565 patients who had received endoscopic therapy to SBVL. There was significant heterogeneity between studies and a random effects model was required. Rebleeding occurred in 242 patients, representing a pooled rebleeding risk of 42.8% after a median follow-up of 20 months. Conclusions: Patients with OGIB who have SBVL identified and successfully treated during BAE have significant rates of rebleeding. Therefore, ongoing clinical monitoring and consideration of repeat endoscopic investigations is recommended for these patients. Funding Agencies: None