SCIDOT-16. T2-WEIGHTED IMAGING MAY BE INDICATIVE OF DRUG DISTRIBUTION IN GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS. (11th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jackson, Pamela; Kim, Minjee; Hawkins-Daarud, Andrea; Singleton, Kyle; Mohammad, Afroz; Burns, Terence; Parney, Ian; Hu, Leland; Kaufmann, Timothy; Elmquist, William; Sarkaria, Jann; Swanson, Kristin
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology. Volume 21(2019)Supplement 6
• Page Start: vi274
• Page End: vi275
• Publication Date: 2019-11-11
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481
• DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz175.1152
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-8517

Abstract

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Dogma suggests that for brain tumors, regions of enhancement on T1-weighted gadolinium contrast enhanced (T1Gd) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlate with intravenously delivered drug distribution as enhancement indicates a compromised blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, poor response to intravenous therapies highlights the importance of the diffuse disease beyond enhancing regions. This study investigated whether imaging features can provide an accurate prediction of drug distribution. METHODS: Eight brain tumor patients (7 gliomas and 1 metastatic adenocarcinoma) were included in this Phase 0 trial. Presurgery T1-weighted, T1Gd, T2-weighted gadolinium contrast enhanced (T2Gd), and T2-weighted Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2FLAIR) MRIs were acquired. All images underwent bias correction using the N4 algorithm, standardization of intensities, and registration. Prior to incision, patients received both an antibiotic cefazolin (6% BBB penetrance) and levetiracetam (80% BBB penetrance), an anti-seizure drug. Subsequently, multiple blood samples and image-guided biopsies were taken and analyzed for drug concentration using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Biopsy drug levels are reported as Brain-Plasma Ratio (BPR), the ratio of biopsy concentration relative to plasma concentration. Mean image intensity was extracted from an 8x8 mm window surrounding each biopsy location. Regression analysis was performed to determine which combination of image types were linearly predictive of BPR for both drugs. Correlations were also analyzed according to the biopsy location radiographic appearance. RESULTS: Regression analysis revealed that T2Gd intensity was linearly predictive of cefazolin BPR and FLAIR intensity was linearly predictive of levetiracetam BPR (p=0.009 and 0.041, respectively). Grouping samples according the the radiographic appearance revealed that levetiracetam BPR had a similar pattern of values to that of FLAIR intensities and cefazolin BPR had a similar pattern to T2, further supporting the regression analysis results. CONCLUSIONS: Local concentrations of drug may be related to T2-weighted signals (T2Gd and T2FLAIR) rather than the gadolinium distribution on T1Gd images.