Full Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: Safety and Feasibility Analysis of a Multicenter Cohort of 236 Patients. (February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Full Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: Safety and Feasibility Analysis of a Multicenter Cohort of 236 Patients. (February 2020)
- Main Title:
- Full Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: Safety and Feasibility Analysis of a Multicenter Cohort of 236 Patients
- Authors:
- Alfieri, Sergio
Boggi, Ugo
Butturini, Giovanni
Pietrabissa, Andrea
Morelli, Luca
Di Sebastiano, Pierluigi
Vistoli, Fabio
Damoli, Isacco
Peri, Andrea
Lapergola, Alfonso
Fiorillo, Claudio
Panaccio, Paolo
Pugliese, Luigi
Ramera, Marco
De Lio, Nelide
Di Franco, Gregorio
Rosa, Fausto
Menghi, Roberta
Doglietto, Giovanni Battista
Quero, Giuseppe - Abstract:
- Introduction . Despite the widespread use of the robotic technology, only a few studies with small sample sizes report its application to pancreatic diseases treatment. Our aim is to present the results of a multicenter study on the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP). Materials and Methods . All RDPs for benign, borderline, and malignant diseases performed in 5 referral centers from 2008 to 2016 were included. Perioperative outcomes were evaluated. Results . Two hundred thirty-six patients were included. Spleen preservation was performed in 114 cases (48.3%). Operative time was 277.8 ± 93.6 minutes. Progressive improvement in operative time was observed over the study period. Conversion rate was 6.3%. Morbidity occurred in 102 cases (43.2%), mainly due to grade A fistulas. Reoperation was required in 10 patients. Postoperatively, 2 patients died of sepsis due to a grade C fistula. Hospital readmission was necessary in 11 cases. A R0 resection was always achieved, with a mean number of 16.2 ± 15 harvested lymph nodes. Conclusion . To our knowledge, this is one of the largest RDP series. Safety and feasibility including the low conversion rate, the high spleen preservation rate, the adequate operative time, and the acceptable morbidity and mortality rates confirm the validity of this technique. Appropriate oncological outcomes have been also obtained.
- Is Part Of:
- Surgical innovation. Volume 27:Number 1(2020)
- Journal:
- Surgical innovation
- Issue:
- Volume 27:Number 1(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 27, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0027-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 11
- Page End:
- 18
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02
- Subjects:
- robotic surgery -- surgical oncology -- hepatobiliary
Surgery, Operative -- Periodicals
Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals
Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive -- Periodicals
Diffusion of Innovation -- Periodicals
Chirurgie opératoire -- Périodiques
Chirurgie endoscopique -- Périodiques
Chirurgie laparoscopique -- Périodiques
617.91 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.sagepub.com/home/sri ↗
http://sri.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal201793 ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/1553350619868112 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1553-3506
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12230.xml