Use of Stereovision for Intraoperative Coregistration of a Spinal Surgical Field: A Human Feasibility Study. Issue 1 (27th June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lollis, S Scott; Fan, Xiaoyao; Evans, Linton; Olson, Jonathan D; Paulsen, Keith D; Roberts, David W; Mirza, Sohail K; Ji, Songbai
• Is Part Of: Operative neurosurgery. Volume 14:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 29
• Page End: 35
• Publication Date: 2017-06-27
• Subjects: Image guidance -- Coregistration -- Stereovision; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.480590
• DOI: 10.1093/ons/opx132
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2332-4252

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The use of image guidance during spinal surgery has been limited by several anatomic factors such as intervertebral segment motion and ineffective spine immobilization. In its current form, the surgical field is coregistered with a preoperative computed tomography (CT), often obtained in a different spinal confirmation, or with intraoperative cross-sectional imaging. Stereovision offers an alternative method of registration. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of stereovision-mediated coregistration of a human spinal surgical field using a proof-of-principle study, and to provide preliminary assessments of the technique's accuracy. METHODS: A total of 9 subjects undergoing image-guided pedicle screw placement also underwent stereovision-mediated coregistration with preoperative CT imaging. Stereoscopic images were acquired using a tracked, calibrated stereoscopic camera system mounted on an operating microscope. Images were processed, reconstructed, and segmented in a semi-automated manner. A multistart registration of the reconstructed spinal surface with preoperative CT was performed. Registration accuracy, measured as surface-to-surface distance error, was compared between stereovision registration and a standard registration. RESULTS: The mean surface reconstruction error of the stereovision-acquired surface was 2.20 ± 0.89 mm. Intraoperative coregistration with stereovision was performed with a mean error of 1.48 ± 0.35 mm compared to 2.03 ± 0.28 mm using a standard point-based registration method. The average computational time for registration with stereovision was 95 ± 46 s (range 33-184 s) vs 10to 20 min for standard point-based registration. CONCLUSION: Semi-automated registration of a spinal surgical field using stereovision is possible with accuracy that is at least comparable to current landmark-based techniques.