Can intraparty democracy save party activism? Evidence from Korea. (January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Koo, Sejin
• Other Names: Borz Gabriela guest-editor.; Janda Kenneth guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Party politics. Volume 26:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: 32
• Page End: 42
• Publication Date: 2020-01
• Subjects: Dues-paying -- intra-party democracy -- party activism -- party membership -- South Korea; Political parties -- Periodicals; Political science -- Periodicals; 324.2
• DOI: 10.1177/1354068818754601
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1354-0688

Abstract

This article focuses on Korean parties to address the following gaps in the literature on party member activism: First, little attention has been paid to party members in non-Western democracies. Second, it is unclear how intraparty democracy is related to member activism. Unlike most industrialized democracies, South Korea has recently seen a notable growth in party membership. However, dues-paying remains the exception rather than the rule in the major parties, while the opposite is true for the minor, leftist parties. Using data from party member surveys, I examine the determinants of member activism across three Korean parties, focusing on the effect of members' evaluations of the internal democracy of their party. I argue that dues-paying has risen as a new form of activism as democracy has been consolidated, and present evidence for a paradox of intra-party democracy that members positively evaluating internal democracy of their party remain less active.