Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography-guided biopsies for the detection of ischaemic heart disease in a hospital setting. (20th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wagensveld, Ivo M; Blokker, Britt M; Pezzato, Andrea; Wielopolski, Piotr A; Renken, Nomdo S; von der Thüsen, Jan H; Krestin, Gabriel P; Hunink, M G Myriam; Oosterhuis, J Wolter; Weustink, Annick C
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 19:Number 7(2018)
• Page Start: 739
• Page End: 748
• Publication Date: 2018-02-20
• Subjects: postmortem -- magnetic resonance imaging -- computed tomography -- autopsy -- ischaemic heart disease; Cardiovascular system -- Imaging -- Periodicals; Heart -- Imaging -- Periodicals; 616.10754
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jey015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-2404

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: The autopsy rate worldwide is alarmingly low (0–15%). Mortality statistics are important, and it is, therefore, essential to perform autopsies in a sufficient proportion of deaths. The imaging autopsy, non-invasive, or minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) can be used as an alternative to the conventional autopsy in an attempt to improve postmortem diagnostics by increasing the number of postmortem procedures. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and CT-guided biopsy for the detection of acute and chronic myocardial ischaemia. Methods and results: We included 100 consecutive adult patients who died in hospital, and for whom next-of-kin gave permission to perform both conventional autopsy and MIA. The MIA consists of unenhanced total-body MRI and CT followed by CT-guided biopsies. Conventional autopsy was used as reference standard. We calculated sensitivity and specificity and receiver operating characteristics curves for CT and MRI as the stand-alone test or combined with biopsy for detection of acute and chronic myocardial infarction (MI). Sensitivity and specificity of MRI with biopsies for acute MI was 0.97 and 0.95, respectively and 0.90 and 0.75, respectively for chronic MI. MRI without biopsies showed a high specificity (acute: 0.92; chronic: 1.00), but low sensitivity (acute: 0.50; chronic: 0.35). CT (total Agatston calcium score) had a good diagnostic value for chronic MI [area under curve (AUC) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64–0.84], but not for acute MI (AUC 0.60, 95% CI 0.48–0.72). Conclusion: We found that the combination of MRI with biopsies had high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of acute and chronic myocardial ischaemia.