Mental stress test: a rapid, simple, and efficient test to unmask long QT syndrome. Issue 12 (20th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Etienne, Pauline; Huchet, François; Gaborit, Nathalie; Barc, Julien; Thollet, Aurélie; Kyndt, Florence; Guyomarch, Béatrice; Le Marec, Hervé; Charpentier, Flavien; Schott, Jean-Jacques; Redon, Richard; Probst, Vincent; Gourraud, Jean-Baptiste
• Is Part Of: Europace. Volume 20:Issue 12(2018)
• Page Start: 2014
• Page End: 2020
• Publication Date: 2018-04-20
• Subjects: Long QT syndrome -- Diagnosis -- Mental stress; Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Catheter ablation -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euy078
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-5129

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: QT prolongation during mental stress test (MST) has been associated with familial idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. In long QT syndrome (LQTS), up to 30% of mutation carriers have normal QT duration. Our aim was to assess the QT response during MST, and its accuracy in the diagnosis of concealed LQTS. Methods and results: All patients who are carrier of a KCNQ1 or KCNH2 mutations without QT prolongation were enrolled. A control group was constituted of patients with negative exercise and epinephrine tests. Electrocardiogram were recorded at rest and at the maximum heart rate during MST and reviewed by two physicians. Among the 70 patients enrolled (median age 41±2.1 years, 46% male), 36 were mutation carrier for LQTS (20 KCNQ1 and 16 KCNH2), and 34 were controls. KCNQ1 and KCNH2 mutation carriers presented a longer QT interval at baseline [405(389; 416) and 421 (394; 434) ms, respectively] compared with the controls [361(338; 375)ms; P < 0.0001]. QT duration during MST varied by 9 (4; 18) ms in KCNQ1, 3 (−6; 16) ms in KCNH2, and by −22 (−29; −17) ms in controls ( P < 0.0001). These QT variations were independent of heart rate ( P < 0.3751). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a cut-off value of QT variation superior to −11 ms as best predictor of LQTS. It provided 97% sensitivity and 97% specificity of QT prolongation in the diagnosis of LQTS. Conclusion: We identified a paradoxical response of the QT interval during MST in LQTS. Easy to assess, MST may be efficient to unmask concealed LQTS in patients at risk of this pathology.