ANALYSIS OF URINARY EXCRETION DATA FROM THREE PLUTONIUM-CONTAMINATED WOUNDS AT LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY. Issue 2 (14th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Poudel, Deepesh; Klumpp, John A; Waters, Tom L; Bertelli, Luiz
• Is Part Of: Radiation protection dosimetry. Volume 178:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 170
• Page End: 178
• Publication Date: 2017-07-14
• Subjects: Radiation dosimetry -- Periodicals; Radiation -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; 363.1799
• DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx090
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-8420

Abstract

Abstract: The National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP)-156 Report proposes seven different biokinetic models for wound cases depending on the physicochemistry of the contaminant. Because the models were heavily based on experimental animal data, the authors of the report encouraged application and validation of the models using bioassay data from actual human exposures. Each of the wound models was applied to three plutonium-contaminated wounds, and the models resulted in a good agreement to only one of the cases. We then applied a simpler biokinetic model structure to the bioassay data and showed that fitting the transfer rates from this model structure yielded better agreement with the data than does the best-fitting NCRP-156 model. Because the biokinetics of radioactive material in each wound is different, it is impractical to propose a discrete set of model parameters to describe the biokinetics of radionuclides in all wounds, and thus each wound should be treated empirically.