Optical follow-up observation of Fast Radio Burst 151230. (10th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tominaga, Nozomu; Niino, Yuu; Totani, Tomonori; Yasuda, Naoki; Furusawa, Hisanori; Tanaka, Masayuki; Bhandari, Shivani; Dodson, Richard; Keane, Evan; Morokuma, Tomoki; Petroff, Emily; Possenti, Andrea
• Is Part Of: Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. Volume 70:Number 6(2018:Dec.)
• Publication Date: 2018-10-10
• Subjects: methods: observational -- pulsars: general -- radio continuum: general -- supernovae: general -- surveys; Astronomy -- Periodicals; 520.5
• DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psy101
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0004-6264

Abstract

Abstract: The origin of fast radio bursts (FRBs), bright millisecond radio transients, is still somewhat of a mystery. Several theoretical models expect that the FRB accompanies an optical afterglow (e.g., Totani et al., 2013, PASJ, 65, L12; Kashiyama 2013, ApJ, 776, L39). In order to investigate the origin of FRBs, we perform gri -band follow-up observations of FRB 151230 (estimated $z$ ≲ 0.8) with Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam at 8, 11, and 14 days after discovery. The follow-up observation reaches a 50% completeness magnitude of 26.5 mag for point sources, which is the deepest optical follow-up of FRBs to-date. We find 13 counterpart candidates with variabilities during the observation. We investigate their properties with multi-color and multi-wavelength observations and archival catalogs. Two candidates are excluded by the non-detection of FRB 151230 in the other radio feed horns that operated simultaneously to the detection, as well as the inconsistency between the photometric redshift and that derived from the dispersion measure of FRB 151230. Eight further candidates are consistent with optical variability seen in active galactic nuclei (AGNs). Two more candidates are well fitted with transient templates (Type IIn supernovae), and the final candidate is poorly fitted with all of our transient templates and is located off-center of an extended source. It can only be reproduced with rapid transients with a faint peak and rapid decline, and the probability of chance coincidence is ∼3.6%. We also find that none of our candidates are consistent with Type Ia supernovae, which rules out the association of Type Ia supernovae to FRB 151230 at $z$ ≤ 0.6 and limits the dispersion measure of the host galaxy to ≲300 pc cm −3 in a Type Ia supernova scenario.