Grey is the new black: covert action and implausible deniability. (1st May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cormac, Rory; Aldrich, Richard J.
• Is Part Of: International affairs. Volume 94:Number 3(2018)
• Page Start: 477
• Page End: 494
• Publication Date: 2018-05-01
• Subjects: Cold War -- foreign policy -- history and International Relations -- international security -- Russia; International relations -- Periodicals; World politics -- Periodicals; 327.05
• DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiy067
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-5850

Abstract

Abstract: For hundreds of years, states have sought to intervene in the affairs of others in a surreptitious manner. Since the professionalization of intelligence services in the aftermath of the Second World War, this behaviour has become known as covert action, which—for generations of scholars—has been defined as plausibly deniable intervention in the affairs of others; the sponsor's hand is neither apparent nor acknowledged. We challenge this orthodoxy. By turning the spotlight away from covert action and onto plausible deniability itself, we argue that even in its supposed heyday, the concept was deeply problematic. Changes in technology and the media, combined with the rise of special forces and private military companies, give it even less credibility today. We live in an era of implausible deniability and ambiguous warfare. Paradoxically, this does not spell the end of covert action. Instead, leaders are embracing implausible deniability and the ambiguity it creates. We advance a new conception of covert action, historically grounded but fit for the twenty-first century: unacknowledged interference in the affairs of others.