Impact of low-dose computed tomography screening on lung cancer mortality among asbestos-exposed workers. (15th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barbone, Fabio; Barbiero, Fabiano; Belvedere, Ornella; Rosolen, Valentina; Giangreco, Manuela; Zanin, Tina; Pisa, Federica E; Meduri, Stefano; Follador, Alessandro; Grossi, Francesco; Fasola, Gianpiero
• Is Part Of: International journal of epidemiology. Volume 47:Number 6(2018)
• Page Start: 1981
• Page End: 1991
• Publication Date: 2018-10-15
• Subjects: Lung cancer -- screening -- low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) -- mortality -- asbestos; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy212
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-5771

Abstract

Abstract: Background: We previously showed that low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening in asbestos-exposed workers is effective in detecting lung cancer (LC) at an early stage. Here, we evaluate whether LDCT screening could reduce mortality from LC in such a high-risk population. Methods: Within a cohort of 2433 asbestos-exposed men enrolled in an Occupational Health surveillance programme, we compared mortality between the participants in the ATOM002 study (LDCT-P, N = 926) and contemporary non-participants (LDCT-NP, N = 1507). We estimated standardized mortality ratios for the LDCT-P and LDCT-NP populations using regional and national rates (SMR_FVG and SMR_ITA, respectively). We compared survival for all causes, all neoplasms, LC and malignant neoplasm of pleura (MNP) between LDCT-P and LDCT-NP using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, smoking history, asbestos exposure level and comorbidities. Results: A reduction in mortality from LC was observed in the LDCT-P group compared with regional and national figures (SMR_FVG = 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-1.09; SMR_ITA = 0.51, 95% CI 0.22-1.01); this was not the case for the LDCT-NP group (SMR_FVG = 2.07, 95% CI 1.53-2.73; SMR_ITA = 1.98, 95% CI 1.47-2.61). A strong reduction in LC mortality was observed for the LDCT-P compared with the LDCT-NP [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.96]. Mortality was also reduced for all causes (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.84), but not for all neoplasms (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.62-1.50) and MNP (HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.31-2.41) within the LDCT-P population. Conclusions: In our cohort, participation in the LDCT screening study was associated with reduced mortality from LC. This finding supports the use of LDCT in surveillance programmes for asbestos-exposed workers.