Prevalence and clinical impact of minority resistant variants in patients failing an integrase inhibitor-based regimen by ultra-deep sequencing. (4th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nguyen, T; Fofana, D B; Lê, M P; Charpentier, C; Peytavin, G; Wirden, M; Lambert-Niclot, S; Desire, N; Grude, M; Morand-Joubert, L; Flandre, P; Katlama, C; Descamps, D; Calvez, V; Todesco, E; Marcelin, A G
• Is Part Of: Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. Volume 73:Number 9(2018)
• Page Start: 2485
• Page End: 2492
• Publication Date: 2018-06-04
• Subjects: Anti-infective agents -- Periodicals; Chemotherapy -- Periodicals; 615.58
• DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky198
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-7453

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are recommended by international guidelines as first-line therapy in antiretroviral-naive and -experienced HIV-1-infected patients. Objectives: This study aimed at evaluating the prevalence at failure of INSTI-resistant variants and the impact of baseline minority resistant variants (MiRVs) on the virological response to an INSTI-based regimen. Methods: Samples at failure of 134 patients failing a raltegravir-containing ( n = 65), an elvitegravir-containing ( n = 20) or a dolutegravir-containing ( n = 49) regimen were sequenced by Sanger sequencing and ultra-deep sequencing (UDS). Baseline samples of patients with virological failure (VF) ( n = 34) and of those with virological success (VS) ( n = 31) under INSTI treatment were sequenced by UDS. Data were analysed using the SmartGene platform, and resistance was interpreted according to the ANRS algorithm version 27. Results: At failure, the prevalence of at least one INSTI-resistant variant was 39.6% by Sanger sequencing and 57.5% by UDS, changing the interpretation of resistance in 17/134 (13%) patients. Among 53 patients harbouring at least one resistance mutation detected by both techniques, the most dominant INSTI resistance mutations were N155H (45%), Q148H/K/R (23%), T97A (19%) and Y143C (11%). There was no difference in prevalence of baseline MiRVs between patients with VF and those with VS. MiRVs found at baseline in patients with VF were not detected at failure either in majority or minority mutations. Conclusions: UDS is more sensitive than Sanger sequencing at detecting INSTI MiRVs at treatment failure. The presence of MiRVs at failure could be important to the decision to switch to other INSTIs. However, there was no association between the presence of baseline MiRVs and the response to INSTI-based therapies in our study.