Liquid Formulation of AbobotulinumtoxinA Exhibits a Favorable Efficacy and Safety Profile in Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Trial. (14th February 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Liquid Formulation of AbobotulinumtoxinA Exhibits a Favorable Efficacy and Safety Profile in Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Trial. (14th February 2017)
- Main Title:
- Liquid Formulation of AbobotulinumtoxinA Exhibits a Favorable Efficacy and Safety Profile in Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Trial
- Authors:
- Ascher, Benjamin
Kestemont, Philippe
Boineau, Dominique
Bodokh, Isaac
Stein, Annette
Heckmann, Marc
Dendorfer, Markus
Pavicic, Tatjana
Volteau, Magali
Tse, Anissa
Picaut, Philippe
Rzany, Berthold - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: In most countries, approved botulinum toxin type A formulations require reconstitution before injection. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a ready-to-use liquid formulation of abobotulinumtoxinA (abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection, ASI) in subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines (GL). Methods: In this Phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study, 176 female subjects (aged 30 to 60 years) were randomized into five treatment groups: ASI 20, 50, or 75 U, reconstituted abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) 50 U, and placebo. GL severity was assessed at maximum frown using a 4-point grading scale. Responders were subjects with severity grade of moderate [2] or severe [3] at baseline improving to none [0] or mild [1], evaluated at each time-point by Investigator's Live Assessment (ILA) or Subject's Self-Assessment (SSA). Safety profiles were also determined. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Responder rates on Day 29 by ILA were significantly greater for ASI 20, 50, and 75 U versus placebo (88.9%, 91.4%, and 87.9% vs. 0%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Similar results were observed by SSA. A greater proportion of responders was observed in ASI groups vs placebo from Day 8 to 113 for ILA and SSA ( P < 0.001). AboBoNT-A responder rate on Day 29 for ILA was 77.1% ( P < 0.1006 vs ASI 50 U); with comparable results by SSA. The ASI safety profile was comparable to that of aboBoNT-A. Conclusions:Abstract: Background: In most countries, approved botulinum toxin type A formulations require reconstitution before injection. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a ready-to-use liquid formulation of abobotulinumtoxinA (abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection, ASI) in subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines (GL). Methods: In this Phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study, 176 female subjects (aged 30 to 60 years) were randomized into five treatment groups: ASI 20, 50, or 75 U, reconstituted abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) 50 U, and placebo. GL severity was assessed at maximum frown using a 4-point grading scale. Responders were subjects with severity grade of moderate [2] or severe [3] at baseline improving to none [0] or mild [1], evaluated at each time-point by Investigator's Live Assessment (ILA) or Subject's Self-Assessment (SSA). Safety profiles were also determined. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Responder rates on Day 29 by ILA were significantly greater for ASI 20, 50, and 75 U versus placebo (88.9%, 91.4%, and 87.9% vs. 0%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Similar results were observed by SSA. A greater proportion of responders was observed in ASI groups vs placebo from Day 8 to 113 for ILA and SSA ( P < 0.001). AboBoNT-A responder rate on Day 29 for ILA was 77.1% ( P < 0.1006 vs ASI 50 U); with comparable results by SSA. The ASI safety profile was comparable to that of aboBoNT-A. Conclusions: Ready-to-use liquid formulation of abobotulinumtoxinA was shown to be efficacious, with comparable results to reconstituted abobotulinumtoxinA, and to have a favorable safety profile in subjects with severe to moderate GL. Level of Evidence: 1: … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Aesthetic surgery journal. Volume 38(2018)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Aesthetic surgery journal
- Issue:
- Volume 38(2018)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 38, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0038-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 183
- Page End:
- 191
- Publication Date:
- 2017-02-14
- Subjects:
- Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
617.95 - Journal URLs:
- http://asj.oxfordjournals.org/content/ ↗
http://aes.sagepub.com/content/by/year ↗
http://www.mosby.com/aesthetic ↗
http://online.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1090820X ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/asj/sjw272 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1090-820X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0730.384000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12172.xml