Blind prediction of homo‐ and hetero‐protein complexes: The CASP13‐CAPRI experiment. Issue 12 (25th October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Blind prediction of homo‐ and hetero‐protein complexes: The CASP13‐CAPRI experiment. Issue 12 (25th October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Blind prediction of homo‐ and hetero‐protein complexes: The CASP13‐CAPRI experiment
- Authors:
- Lensink, Marc F.
Brysbaert, Guillaume
Nadzirin, Nurul
Velankar, Sameer
Chaleil, Raphaël A. G.
Gerguri, Tereza
Bates, Paul A.
Laine, Elodie
Carbone, Alessandra
Grudinin, Sergei
Kong, Ren
Liu, Ran‐Ran
Xu, Xi‐Ming
Shi, Hang
Chang, Shan
Eisenstein, Miriam
Karczynska, Agnieszka
Czaplewski, Cezary
Lubecka, Emilia
Lipska, Agnieszka
Krupa, Paweł
Mozolewska, Magdalena
Golon, Łukasz
Samsonov, Sergey
Liwo, Adam
Crivelli, Silvia
Pagès, Guillaume
Karasikov, Mikhail
Kadukova, Maria
Yan, Yumeng
Huang, Sheng‐You
Rosell, Mireia
Rodríguez‐Lumbreras, Luis A.
Romero‐Durana, Miguel
Díaz‐Bueno, Lucía
Fernandez‐Recio, Juan
Christoffer, Charles
Terashi, Genki
Shin, Woong‐Hee
Aderinwale, Tunde
Maddhuri Venkata Subraman, Sai Raghavendra
Kihara, Daisuke
Kozakov, Dima
Vajda, Sandor
Porter, Kathryn
Padhorny, Dzmitry
Desta, Israel
Beglov, Dmitri
Ignatov, Mikhail
Kotelnikov, Sergey
Moal, Iain H.
Ritchie, David W.
Chauvot de Beauchêne, Isaure
Maigret, Bernard
Devignes, Marie‐Dominique
Ruiz Echartea, Maria E.
Barradas‐Bautista, Didier
Cao, Zhen
Cavallo, Luigi
Oliva, Romina
Cao, Yue
Shen, Yang
Baek, Minkyung
Park, Taeyong
Woo, Hyeonuk
Seok, Chaok
Braitbard, Merav
Bitton, Lirane
Scheidman‐Duhovny, Dina
Dapkūnas, Justas
Olechnovič, Kliment
Venclovas, Česlovas
Kundrotas, Petras J.
Belkin, Saveliy
Chakravarty, Devlina
Badal, Varsha D.
Vakser, Ilya A.
Vreven, Thom
Vangaveti, Sweta
Borrman, Tyler
Weng, Zhiping
Guest, Johnathan D.
Gowthaman, Ragul
Pierce, Brian G.
Xu, Xianjin
Duan, Rui
Qiu, Liming
Hou, Jie
Ryan Merideth, Benjamin
Ma, Zhiwei
Cheng, Jianlin
Zou, Xiaoqin
Koukos, Panagiotis I.
Roel‐Touris, Jorge
Ambrosetti, Francesco
Geng, Cunliang
Schaarschmidt, Jörg
Trellet, Mikael E.
Melquiond, Adrien S. J.
Xue, Li
Jiménez‐García, Brian
van Noort, Charlotte W.
Honorato, Rodrigo V.
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
Wodak, Shoshana J.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: We present the results for CAPRI Round 46, the third joint CASP‐CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of 20 targets including 14 homo‐oligomers and 6 heterocomplexes. Eight of the homo‐oligomer targets and one heterodimer comprised proteins that could be readily modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank, often available for the full assembly. The remaining 11 targets comprised 5 homodimers, 3 heterodimers, and two higher‐order assemblies. These were more difficult to model, as their prediction mainly involved "ab‐initio" docking of subunit models derived from distantly related templates. A total of ~30 CAPRI groups, including 9 automatic servers, submitted on average ~2000 models per target. About 17 groups participated in the CAPRI scoring rounds, offered for most targets, submitting ~170 models per target. The prediction performance, measured by the fraction of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted across all predictors groups, was very good to excellent for the nine easy targets. Poorer performance was achieved by predictors for the 11 difficult targets, with medium and high quality models submitted for only 3 of these targets. A similar performance "gap" was displayed by scorer groups, highlighting yet again the unmet challenge of modeling the conformational changes of the protein components that occur upon binding or that must be accounted for in template‐based modeling. Our analysis also indicates thatAbstract: We present the results for CAPRI Round 46, the third joint CASP‐CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of 20 targets including 14 homo‐oligomers and 6 heterocomplexes. Eight of the homo‐oligomer targets and one heterodimer comprised proteins that could be readily modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank, often available for the full assembly. The remaining 11 targets comprised 5 homodimers, 3 heterodimers, and two higher‐order assemblies. These were more difficult to model, as their prediction mainly involved "ab‐initio" docking of subunit models derived from distantly related templates. A total of ~30 CAPRI groups, including 9 automatic servers, submitted on average ~2000 models per target. About 17 groups participated in the CAPRI scoring rounds, offered for most targets, submitting ~170 models per target. The prediction performance, measured by the fraction of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted across all predictors groups, was very good to excellent for the nine easy targets. Poorer performance was achieved by predictors for the 11 difficult targets, with medium and high quality models submitted for only 3 of these targets. A similar performance "gap" was displayed by scorer groups, highlighting yet again the unmet challenge of modeling the conformational changes of the protein components that occur upon binding or that must be accounted for in template‐based modeling. Our analysis also indicates that residues in binding interfaces were less well predicted in this set of targets than in previous Rounds, providing useful insights for directions of future improvements. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Proteins. Volume 87:Issue 12(2019)
- Journal:
- Proteins
- Issue:
- Volume 87:Issue 12(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 87, Issue 12 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 87
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0087-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1200
- Page End:
- 1221
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10-25
- Subjects:
- blind prediction -- CAPRI -- CASP -- docking -- oligomeric state -- protein assemblies -- protein complexes -- protein‐protein interaction -- template‐based modeling
Proteins -- Periodicals
Proteins -- Periodicals
572.6 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/prot.25838 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0887-3585
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6936.164000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12143.xml