Estimation of model accuracy in CASP13. Issue 12 (16th July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cheng, Jianlin; Choe, Myong‐Ho; Elofsson, Arne; Han, Kun‐Sop; Hou, Jie; Maghrabi, Ali H. A.; McGuffin, Liam J.; Menéndez‐Hurtado, David; Olechnovič, Kliment; Schwede, Torsten; Studer, Gabriel; Uziela, Karolis; Venclovas, Česlovas; Wallner, Björn
• Is Part Of: Proteins. Volume 87:Issue 12(2019)
• Page Start: 1361
• Page End: 1377
• Publication Date: 2019-07-16
• Subjects: Proteins -- Periodicals; Proteins -- Periodicals; 572.6
• DOI: 10.1002/prot.25767
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0887-3585

Abstract

Abstract: Methods to reliably estimate the accuracy of 3D models of proteins are both a fundamental part of most protein folding pipelines and important for reliable identification of the best models when multiple pipelines are used. Here, we describe the progress made from CASP12 to CASP13 in the field of estimation of model accuracy (EMA) as seen from the progress of the most successful methods in CASP13. We show small but clear progress, that is, several methods perform better than the best methods from CASP12 when tested on CASP13 EMA targets. Some progress is driven by applying deep learning and residue‐residue contacts to model accuracy prediction. We show that the best EMA methods select better models than the best servers in CASP13, but that there exists a great potential to improve this further. Also, according to the evaluation criteria based on local similarities, such as lDDT and CAD, it is now clear that single model accuracy methods perform relatively better than consensus‐based methods.