Understanding Semantic Coordination in Cognition. (14th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rattan, Gurpreet
• Is Part Of: Dialectica. Volume 73:Fascicule 3(2019)
• Page Start: 289
• Page End: 313
• Publication Date: 2019-11-14
• Subjects: Psychology -- Periodicals; Dialectic -- Periodicals; 105
• DOI: 10.1111/1746-8361.12272
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-2017

Abstract

Abstract: Kit Fine (2007) outlines an account of semantic coordination, an account motivated by the role of semantic coordination in cognition. Actually, Fine outlines two accounts of semantic coordination, one in terms of co‐reference and another in terms of synonymy. I argue, first, that Fine's two accounts are not equivalent, with one being logically stronger than the other, but second and more importantly, that neither account is correct. I outline an alternative account of semantic coordination – the epistemic conception of semantic coordination – that links semantic and epistemic aspects of cognition more directly. The most surprising result of my alternative account of semantic coordination is that semantic coordination is a relation that can hold between elements of thought and language of different semantic types. I close the paper by briefly outlining some applications of the idea that semantic coordination is a relation that can hold across semantic types.