A modeling framework to assess specific energy, costs and environmental impacts of Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. Issue 11 (28th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schneider, Simon F.; Bauer, Christian; Novák, Petr; Berg, Erik J.
• Is Part Of: Sustainable energy & fuels. Volume 3:Issue 11(2019)
• Page Start: 3061
• Page End: 3070
• Publication Date: 2019-08-28
• Subjects: Renewable energy sources -- Periodicals; Fuel cells -- Periodicals; Electric batteries -- Periodicals; Electrochemistry -- Periodicals; 660.297
• DOI: 10.1039/c9se00427k
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-4902

Abstract

Abstract : Holistic assessment of Li-ion and Na-ion batteries through integration of physics-based battery model into economic and environmental analysis framework. Abstract : Li-ion batteries (LIBs) are among the most advanced technologies for energy storage. Due to the potential criticality of lithium raw materials, Na-ion batteries (NIBs) are frequently suggested as a low-cost, environmentally benign alternative to eventually complement or even replace LIBs. Herein, we present a holistic modeling framework to assess the potential of NIB cells from a performance, cost, and environmental impact perspective. To this end, we employ a physics-based battery cell model to project practical specific energies of LIB and NIB cells subjected to varying discharge rates. The derived performance metrics are subsequently used to parameterize a bottom-up battery cell cost model and to assess life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emission. Benchmarking model results obtained for NIBs (NaNi1/3 Co1/3 Mn1/3 O2 vs. hard carbon) against state-of-the-art LIBs (LiNi1/3 Co1/3 Mn1/3 O2 vs. graphite), we find that NIBs made from currently available active materials cannot compete with LIBs in terms of performance, costs, and environmental impact. Identifying battery performance as a key parameter driving manufacturing costs and GHG emissions, we argue that in order to make NIBs competitive to LIBs, one of the main priorities of NIB research should be the development of anode and cathode materials offering specific charges, voltages, and cycle life times comparable to or higher than for LIB active materials.