Safety culture in intensive care internationally and in Australia: A narrative review of the literature. Issue 6 (November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dunstan, Elspeth; Cook, Jane-Louise; Coyer, Fiona
• Is Part Of: Australian critical care. Volume 32:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: 524
• Page End: 539
• Publication Date: 2019-11
• Subjects: Safety culture -- Safety climate -- Intensive care -- Survey; Intensive care nursing -- Periodicals; Intensive care nursing -- Australia -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.028
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.11.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1036-7314

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Assessment of safety culture in health care is of particular relevance in the complex intensive care setting, where the effects of human error can have catastrophic consequences. The aim of this review was to examine the literature on safety culture in intensive care units (ICUs) and specifically, to explore the state of knowledge regarding safety culture in the context of Australian ICUs. Methods: A search was conducted of key databases for studies published in English between January 2008 and December 2017 using terms 'safety culture', 'safety climate', 'safety attitude', 'intensive care', 'ICU' and 'critical care'. Studies were included if they presented original research, utilised the teamwork and safety climate factors of a quantitative survey tool to assess safety culture, the sample population included participants working in an adult intensive care, and the findings were reported in the context of intensive care. Results: Of the 36 studies identified, two were conducted in Australia. The studies demonstrate a rapid expansion in safety culture assessment globally. Three levels of safety culture application in intensive care were identified, including safety culture assessment, effect of an intervention on safety culture, and evaluation of the association between safety culture and structural, process and outcomes measures. The use of targeted safety culture domains is emerging. Common findings included variation in perceptions of safety culture between ICUs, unit and hospital management, and professional groups. Conclusion: Though the assessment of safety culture in ICUs has been an area of prolific research internationally over the past ten years, the Australian context is limited and could be advanced through further research, including the effect on safety culture of interventions, and to establish the association between safety culture and patient safety outcomes. Longitudinal studies to demonstrate sustained intervention effects on safety culture should be considered.