How has SPI changed in times of agile development? Results from a multi‐method study. Issue 11 (29th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Küpper, Steffen; Pfahl, Dietmar; Jürisoo, Kristjan; Diebold, Philipp; Münch, Jürgen; Kuhrmann, Marco
• Is Part Of: Journal of software. Volume 31:Issue 11(2019)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2019-08-29
• Subjects: agile methods -- software process improvement -- SPI -- systematic review; Software engineering -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Development -- Periodicals; Software maintenance -- Periodicals; 005.1
• DOI: 10.1002/smr.2182
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-7473

Abstract

Abstract: The emergence of agile methods and practices has not only changed the development processes but might also have affected how companies conduct software process improvement (SPI). Through a set of complementary studies, we aim to understand how SPI has changed in times of agile software development. Specifically, we aim (a) to identify and characterize the set of publications that connect elements of agility to SPI, (b) to explore to which extent agile methods/practices have been used in the context of SPI, and (c) to understand whether the topics addressed in the literature are relevant and useful for industry professionals. To study these questions, we conducted an in‐depth analysis of the literature identified in a previous mapping study, an interview study, and an analysis of the responses given by industry professionals to SPI‐related questions stemming from an independently conducted survey study. Regarding the first question, we identified 55 publications that focus on both SPI and agility of which 48 present and discuss how agile methods/practices are used to steer SPI initiatives. Regarding the second question, we found that the two most frequently mentioned agile methods in the context of SPI are Scrum and Extreme Programming (XP), while the most frequently mentioned agile practices are integrate often, test‐first, daily meeting, pair programming, retrospective, on‐site customer, and product backlog . Regarding the third question, we found that a majority of the interviewed and surveyed industry professionals see SPI as a continuous activity. They agree with the agile SPI literature that agile methods/practices play an important role in SPI activities but that the importance given to specific agile methods/practices does not always coincide with the frequency with which these methods/practices are mentioned in the literature. Abstract : The emergence of agile methods and practices has not only changed the development processes but might also have affected how companies conduct software process improvement (SPI). Through a set of complementary studies, we aim to understand how SPI has changed in times of agile software development. Our research indicates that the trend towards agile SPI is visible both in the research literature and in surveys and interviews with industry professionals