Clinical Outcomes With Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. (10th August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ricciuto, Amanda; Dhaliwal, Jasbir; Walters, Thomas D; Griffiths, Anne M; Church, Peter C
• Is Part Of: Journal of Crohn's and colitis. Volume 12:Number 11(2018:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1302
• Page End: 1315
• Publication Date: 2018-08-10
• Subjects: Anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha -- inflammatory bowel disease -- therapeutic drug monitoring; Inflammatory bowel diseases -- Periodicals; 616.344005
• DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy109
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1873-9946

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aims: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] to improve clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha [anti-TNF] drugs. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, EMBASE and Cochrane up to October 2017 for randomized trials [RCTs] and cohort studies comparing proactive or reactive TDM to each other or empiric care. Outcomes included clinical remission [primary], clinical relapse, endoscopic remission, anti-TNF response durability, cost and adverse events [secondary]. Pooled odds ratios and mean differences were calculated. Results: The search identified nine studies [three RCTs, six observational], focused on infliximab maintenance therapy in adults. Neither proactive nor reactive TDM was associated with superior clinical remission rates compared to empiric dose optimization. However, evidence of a cost benefit, particularly for reactive TDM vs empiric care, was identified. In several studies, TDM, particularly proactive TDM, was associated with favourable outcomes related to durability of anti-TNF response, such as lower drug discontinuation rates compared to empiric care and reactive TDM, and lower relapse rates compared to empiric care. No consistent benefit was found for endoscopic or surgical outcomes. Conclusions: The existing limited evidence does not support an association between any TDM strategy and superior clinical remission rates but does support a cost savings benefit [particularly for reactive TDM] and suggests a potential benefit for anti-TNF durability [particularly proactive TDM]. Additional, longer-term studies are needed, particularly to further investigate proactive TDM, and to generate data on other anti-TNF agents, the induction period and paediatric populations.