Anatomic Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes and Aesthetic Results Compared to Smooth Round Silicone Implants. (15th March 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Anatomic Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes and Aesthetic Results Compared to Smooth Round Silicone Implants. (15th March 2019)
- Main Title:
- Anatomic Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes and Aesthetic Results Compared to Smooth Round Silicone Implants
- Authors:
- Agochukwu-Nwubah, Nneamaka
Boustany, Ashley
Wetzel, Margaret
Maus, Jacob
Rinker, Brian - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Direct comparison studies of outcomes and aesthetic satisfaction of anatomic implants compared to other implants are scarce in the literature. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare outcomes and aesthetic satisfaction of patients who underwent breast reconstruction with anatomic implants vs other implants (smooth round silicone). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction over 3 years. Outcomes including complications, number of surgeries, need for revisions, and aesthetic satisfaction of patients were tracked and compared. Results: A total of 156 patients met inclusion criteria for this study. A total of 123 underwent reconstruction with a round implant, and 33 underwent reconstruction with an anatomic implant. Of the 156 patients, 38 underwent a 1-stage direct-to-implant reconstruction and the remainder underwent a 2-stage implant reconstruction. The round and anatomic implant groups did not differ with regards to number of surgeries, revisions, utilization of contralateral symmetry procedures, implant-related reoperations, complications, implant loss, infection, capsular contracture, and seroma. The Breast Q survey had a response rate of 27%. On all parameters, the round and anatomic implant groups did not significantly differ. Conclusions: There were no significant differences among round and shaped implants in regards to complications, revision surgeries, andAbstract: Background: Direct comparison studies of outcomes and aesthetic satisfaction of anatomic implants compared to other implants are scarce in the literature. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare outcomes and aesthetic satisfaction of patients who underwent breast reconstruction with anatomic implants vs other implants (smooth round silicone). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction over 3 years. Outcomes including complications, number of surgeries, need for revisions, and aesthetic satisfaction of patients were tracked and compared. Results: A total of 156 patients met inclusion criteria for this study. A total of 123 underwent reconstruction with a round implant, and 33 underwent reconstruction with an anatomic implant. Of the 156 patients, 38 underwent a 1-stage direct-to-implant reconstruction and the remainder underwent a 2-stage implant reconstruction. The round and anatomic implant groups did not differ with regards to number of surgeries, revisions, utilization of contralateral symmetry procedures, implant-related reoperations, complications, implant loss, infection, capsular contracture, and seroma. The Breast Q survey had a response rate of 27%. On all parameters, the round and anatomic implant groups did not significantly differ. Conclusions: There were no significant differences among round and shaped implants in regards to complications, revision surgeries, and overall outcomes. Furthermore, patients showed no differences regarding satisfaction and well-being when surveyed on the Breast Q survey. The decision of implant choice in breast reconstruction should be based on surgeon comfort and the patient's needs/body type. : Level of Evidence: 4 … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Aesthetic surgery journal. Volume 39:Number 8(2019)
- Journal:
- Aesthetic surgery journal
- Issue:
- Volume 39:Number 8(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 39, Issue 8 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 39
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0039-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 322
- Page End:
- 330
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03-15
- Subjects:
- Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
617.95 - Journal URLs:
- http://asj.oxfordjournals.org/content/ ↗
http://aes.sagepub.com/content/by/year ↗
http://www.mosby.com/aesthetic ↗
http://online.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1090820X ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/asj/sjz074 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1090-820X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0730.384000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12136.xml