Improved estimation of macroevolutionary rates from fossil data using a Bayesian framework. Issue 4 (12th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Silvestro, Daniele; Salamin, Nicolas; Antonelli, Alexandre; Meyer, Xavier
• Is Part Of: Paleobiology. Volume 45:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 546
• Page End: 570
• Publication Date: 2019-09-12
• Subjects: Paleobiology -- Periodicals; Paléobiologie -- Périodiques; 560
• DOI: 10.1017/pab.2019.23
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-8373

Abstract

Abstract: The estimation of origination and extinction rates and their temporal variation is central to understanding diversity patterns and the evolutionary history of clades. The fossil record provides the only direct evidence of extinction and biodiversity changes through time and has long been used to infer the dynamics of diversity changes in deep time. The software PyRate implements a Bayesian framework to analyze fossil occurrence data to estimate the rates of preservation, origination, and extinction while incorporating several sources of uncertainty. Building upon this framework, we present a suite of methodological advances including more complex and realistic models of preservation and the first likelihood-based test to compare the fit across different models. Further, we develop a new reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to estimate origination and extinction rates and their temporal variation, which provides more reliable results and includes an explicit estimation of the number and temporal placement of statistically significant rate changes. Finally, we implement a new C++ library that speeds up the analyses by orders of magnitude, therefore facilitating the application of the PyRate methods to large data sets. We demonstrate the new functionalities through extensive simulations and with the analysis of a large data set of Cenozoic marine mammals. We compare our analytical framework against two widely used alternative methods to infer origination and extinction rates, revealing that PyRate decisively outperforms them across a range of simulated data sets. Our analyses indicate that explicit statistical model testing, which is often neglected in fossil-based macroevolutionary analyses, is crucial to obtain accurate and robust results.