Outcomes Following Macrolide Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Issue 1 (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jeong, Rachel; Quinn, Robert R.; Lentine, Krista L.; Lloyd, Anita; Ravani, Pietro; Hemmelgarn, Brenda; Braam, Branko; Garg, Amit X.; Wen, Kevin; Wong-Chan, Anita; Gourishankar, Sita; Lam, Ngan N.
• Is Part Of: Canadian journal of kidney health and disease =. Volume 6:Issue 1(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: adverse drug event -- macrolide -- calcineurin inhibitor -- kidney transplant; Kidneys -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Nephrology -- Periodicals; Dialysis -- Periodicals; Kidneys -- Transplantation -- Periodicals; Kidney Diseases -- Periodicals; Nephrology -- Periodicals; Dialysis -- Periodicals; Kidney Transplantation -- Periodicals; Dialysis; Kidneys -- Diseases; Kidneys -- Transplantation; Nephrology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.61005
• DOI: 10.1177/2054358119830706
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2054-3581

Abstract

Background: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI; cyclosporine, tacrolimus) are critical for kidney transplant immunosuppression, but have multiple potential drug interactions, such as with macrolide antibiotics. Macrolide antibiotics (clarithromycin, erythromycin, and azithromycin) are often used to treat atypical infections. Clarithromycin and erythromycin inhibit CNI metabolism and increase the risk of CNI nephrotoxicity, while azithromycin does not. Objective: To determine the frequency of CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions, the proportion who receive post-prescription monitoring, and the risk of adverse drug events in kidney transplant recipients. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: We used linked health care databases in Alberta, Canada. Patients: We included 293 adult kidney transplant recipients from 2008-2015 who were co-prescribed a CNI and macrolide. Measurements: The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause hospitalization, acute kidney injury (creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL or 1.5 times baseline), or death within 30 days of the macrolide prescription. Methods: We identified CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions and compared outcomes in those who received clarithromycin/erythromycin versus azithromycin. We used a linear mixed-effects model to examine the mean change in serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Results: Of the 293 recipients who were co-prescribed a CNI and a macrolide, 38% (n = 112) were prescribed clarithromycin/erythromycin while 62% (n = 181) were prescribed azithromycin. Compared with azithromycin users, clarithromycin/erythromycin users were less likely to have outpatient serum creatinine monitoring post-prescription (56% vs 69%, P = .03). There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the 2 groups (17% vs 11%, P = .11); however, the risk of all-cause hospitalization was higher in the clarithromycin/erythromycin group (10% vs 3%, P = .02). The mean decrement in eGFR was significantly greater in the clarithromycin/erythromycin versus azithromycin group (−5.4 vs −1.9 mL/min/1.73 m 2, P < .05). Limitations: We did not have CNI levels to correlate with the timing of CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions. We also did not have information regarding the indications for macrolide prescriptions. Conclusion: Clarithromycin and erythromycin were frequently co-prescribed in kidney transplant recipients on CNIs despite known drug interactions. Clarithromycin/erythromycin use was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization compared with azithromycin users. Safer prescribing practices in kidney transplant recipients are warranted.