DOZ047.15: Esophageal anastomosis diameter at initial endoscopy after surgery predicts treatment outcomes in patients with esophageal atresia or stricture. (24th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Clark, S J; Ngo, P D; Staffa, S J; Smithers, C J; Hamilton, T E; Jennings, R; Manfredi, M A
• Is Part Of: Diseases of the esophagus. Volume 32(2019)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2019-06-24
• Subjects: Esophagus -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.32
• DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz047.15
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-8694

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Children with esophageal atresia (EA) are at risk for anastomotic stricture that may ultimately need surgical resection. No studies have examined the relationship between anastomotic diameter at the time of initial postop endoscopy and treatment outcomes. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with EA who underwent a Foker procedure for repair of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA), primary repair of EA, or stricture resection for refractory stricture who were seen between January 2016 and May 2018. A refractory stricture was defined as one requiring ≥5 dilations ≤5 months after surgery. The anastomosis diameter was estimated by the endoscopist. We divided diameter sizes into the following groups: 1–2.9 mm, 3–4.9 mm, 5–6.9 mm, 7–8.9 mm, 9–10.9 mm, and 11–14 mm. The Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher's exact test were used. Results: Forty-five patients who had a Foker procedure, 37 who had primary repair, and 58 who had stricture resection were identified. The first EGD occurred a median of 22 days (IQR 21–28) after surgery. Among all EA patients with initial diameter of <3 mm, 82% developed refractory stricture and 41% required stricture resection. Of all patients with initial diameter <5 mm, 74% developed refractory stricture and 33% required stricture resection. Of patients who underwent a Foker procedure with initial diameter <3 mm, 56% required stricture resection; of these patients with initial diameter <5 mm, 53% required stricture resection. Among all EA patients, refractory strictures were significantly more likely in patients with smaller initial diameters ( P < 0.001), from 18 patients (82%) with stricture 1–2 mm to 0 patients (0%) with stricture 11–14 mm. Patients with smaller anastomoses were more likely to need stricture resection ( P = 0.020); 9 patients (41%) with size 1–2 mm underwent stricture resection, while none (0%) with size 11–14 mm needed stricture resection. These differences remained statistically significant for patients who underwent a Foker procedure ( P ≤ 0.001 for stricture resection and refractory stricture). Conclusion: Endoscopy performed shortly after EA repair or stricture resection can help predict which patients are more likely to develop a refractory stricture or require a stricture resection.