Microsurgical mandibular reconstruction using a resin surgical guide combined with a metal reconstructive plate. Issue 8 (2nd May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nuri, Takashi; Ueda, Koichi; Iwanaga, Hiroyuki; Otsuki, Yuki; Nakajima, Yoichiro; Ueno, Takaaki; Kawata, Ryo
• Is Part Of: Microsurgery. Volume 39:Issue 8(2019)
• Page Start: 696
• Page End: 703
• Publication Date: 2019-05-02
• Subjects: Microsurgery -- Periodicals; 617.05
• DOI: 10.1002/micr.30465
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0738-1085

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: In mandibular reconstruction, repositioning the mandibular position is still challenging and time consuming. We invented a new re‐positioning technique using a resin plate combined with a reconstructive plate in reconstructing the mandible with an osteocutaneous free flap. The purpose of this report is to introduce this technique and evaluate the accuracy of mandibular reconstruction using free flaps. We hypothesized that this technique is precise and can reduce intraoperative plate bending at a low cost and short preparation period. Methods: Mandibular reconstruction was successfully performed in a total of 10 cases without any complications. In this technique, a pre‐bent reconstructive plate was prepared in accordance with a three‐dimensional model, and then coated with resin. Intraoperatively, the mandibles were secured by fitting these plates snugly and fixing them using a reconstructive plate. Then the resin was removed and free osteocutaneous free flaps were transfer to the defect. Ten patients with a mean age of 68.2 who underwent mandibular resection for aggressive benign ( n = 1) or malignant disease ( n = 9) were reconstructed using this technique. Seven cases were reconstructed using fibular osteocutaneous free flaps, while scapular osteocutaneous free flaps were used in the remaining cases. The resections entailed: unilateral symphysis and lateral body in four cases, angle to ipsilateral angle in two, ramus to symphysis in two, and lateral body plus angle to symphysis in one case. The deviation of the mandible was evaluated by measuring the preoperative versus postoperative differences in the distances between six bilateral landmarks. Results: There were no complications and flap failure in any of the 10 cases. No further intraoperative plate bending was required. One case underwent additional mucosal resection due to recurrence of cancer. Three cases were referred to postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Two patients expired during follow‐up due to recurrence of cancer. Six cases were put back on a normal diet. The other cases who lacked opposing teeth had to remain on a soft diet. The mean follow‐up period was 46.2 months. The average of the absolute deviation values was 1.45 mm. This value was 0.94 mm in six cases with mandibular body defects and 2.26 mm in four cases with mandibular defects involving the ramus. Conclusions: The present novel technique is simple, quick to prepare, and accurate. This technique can be a viable option for microsurgical mandibular reconstruction.