A nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling approach for ecological data: Using temporal dynamics of vegetation moisture as an example. Issue 18 (15th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Oddi, Facundo J.; Miguez, Fernando E.; Ghermandi, Luciana; Bianchi, Lucas O.; Garibaldi, Lucas A.
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 9:Issue 18(2019)
• Page Start: 10225
• Page End: 10240
• Publication Date: 2019-08-15
• Subjects: correlation structures -- hierarchical modeling -- nonlinearity -- spatio‐temporal variability -- time series; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5543
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

Abstract: Increasingly, often ecologist collects data with nonlinear trends, heterogeneous variances, temporal correlation, and hierarchical structure. Nonlinear mixed‐effects models offer a flexible approach to such data, but the estimation and interpretation of these models present challenges, partly associated with the lack of worked examples in the ecological literature. We illustrate the nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling approach using temporal dynamics of vegetation moisture with field data from northwestern Patagonia. This is a Mediterranean‐type climate region where modeling temporal changes in live fuel moisture content are conceptually relevant (ecological theory) and have practical implications (fire management). We used this approach to answer whether moisture dynamics varies among functional groups and aridity conditions, and compared it with other simpler statistical models. The modeling process is set out "step‐by‐step": We start translating the ideas about the system dynamics to a statistical model, which is made increasingly complex in order to include different sources of variability and correlation structures. We provide guidelines and R scripts (including a new self‐starting function) that make data analyses reproducible. We also explain how to extract the parameter estimates from the R output. Our modeling approach suggests moisture dynamic to vary between grasses and shrubs, and between grasses facing different aridity conditions. Compared to more classical models, the nonlinear mixed‐effects model showed greater goodness of fit and met statistical assumptions. While the mixed‐effects approach accounts for spatial nesting, temporal dependence, and variance heterogeneity; the nonlinear function allowed to model the seasonal pattern. Parameters of the nonlinear mixed‐effects model reflected relevant ecological processes. From an applied perspective, the model could forecast the time when fuel moisture becomes critical to fire occurrence. Due to the lack of worked examples for nonlinear mixed‐effects models in the literature, our modeling approach could be useful to diverse ecologists dealing with complex data. Abstract : Nonlinear mixed‐effects models offer a flexible approach to analyze complex data, but the estimation and interpretation of these models present challenges to ecologists, partly associated with the lack of developed examples in the literature. We illustrate the nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling approach using temporal dynamics of vegetation moisture with field data. We provide guidelines and R scripts that make data analyses reproducible and also explain how to extract the parameter estimates from the R output.