Home ovulation test use and stress during subfertility evaluation: Subarm of a randomized controlled trial. (March 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Home ovulation test use and stress during subfertility evaluation: Subarm of a randomized controlled trial. (March 2019)
- Main Title:
- Home ovulation test use and stress during subfertility evaluation: Subarm of a randomized controlled trial
- Authors:
- Weddell, Sarah
Jones, Georgina L
Duffy, Sheila
Hogg, Cameron
Johnson, Sarah
Ledger, William - Abstract:
- Objectives: A prospective, randomized controlled trial in women seeking to conceive examined the impact of using ovulation tests on self-reported levels of stress, psychological well-being, and quality of life in women with unexplained infertility. Method: The test group used a home ovulation test to detect the day of ovulation, whereas the control group were provided with a predicted day of ovulation based on the average length of menstrual cycle reported during study recruitment. Volunteers collected their first morning urine samples to evaluate biochemical levels of stress (urinary cortisol and estrone-3-glucouronide) and completed questionnaires over two complete menstrual cycles. Results: Overall, the use of digital ovulation tests by sub-fertile women under medical care had negligible negative effects and no detectable positive benefit on psychological well-being, according to multiple measurements of stress by questionnaire and biochemical markers. No significant differences were found between groups for all stress measures at the various study time points, except in relation to "couple concordance" where the test group scored much higher than the control group (mean difference at end of study was 21.25 (95% confidence interval: 9.25, 33.25; P = 0.0015)). The maximum difference in log cortisol: creatinine ratio between the test and control groups was −0.28 (95% confidence interval: −0.69, 0.13). Conclusions: These results do not support propositions that usingObjectives: A prospective, randomized controlled trial in women seeking to conceive examined the impact of using ovulation tests on self-reported levels of stress, psychological well-being, and quality of life in women with unexplained infertility. Method: The test group used a home ovulation test to detect the day of ovulation, whereas the control group were provided with a predicted day of ovulation based on the average length of menstrual cycle reported during study recruitment. Volunteers collected their first morning urine samples to evaluate biochemical levels of stress (urinary cortisol and estrone-3-glucouronide) and completed questionnaires over two complete menstrual cycles. Results: Overall, the use of digital ovulation tests by sub-fertile women under medical care had negligible negative effects and no detectable positive benefit on psychological well-being, according to multiple measurements of stress by questionnaire and biochemical markers. No significant differences were found between groups for all stress measures at the various study time points, except in relation to "couple concordance" where the test group scored much higher than the control group (mean difference at end of study was 21.25 (95% confidence interval: 9.25, 33.25; P = 0.0015)). The maximum difference in log cortisol: creatinine ratio between the test and control groups was −0.28 (95% confidence interval: −0.69, 0.13). Conclusions: These results do not support propositions that using digital ovulation tests can cause stress in women trying to conceive. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Women's health. Volume 15(2019)
- Journal:
- Women's health
- Issue:
- Volume 15(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 15, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0015-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03
- Subjects:
- cortisol -- infertility -- ovulation tests -- questionnaire -- stress -- timed intercourse
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Women -- Health and hygiene -- Periodicals
618.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://whe.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.futuremedicine.com/loi/whe ↗
http://www.futuremedicine.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/1745506519838363 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1745-5057
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9343.378950
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - Digital store
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12120.xml