Patient Reported Outcomes following initiation of Glucagon-like peptide-1 Receptor agonists in patients with type 2 Diabetes in a specialist endocrinology practice of the LMC diabetes registry: The PROGRESS-Diabetes study. (October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Patient Reported Outcomes following initiation of Glucagon-like peptide-1 Receptor agonists in patients with type 2 Diabetes in a specialist endocrinology practice of the LMC diabetes registry: The PROGRESS-Diabetes study. (October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Patient Reported Outcomes following initiation of Glucagon-like peptide-1 Receptor agonists in patients with type 2 Diabetes in a specialist endocrinology practice of the LMC diabetes registry: The PROGRESS-Diabetes study
- Authors:
- Brown, Ruth E.
Abitbol, Alexander
Bajaj, Harpreet S.
Goldenberg, Ronald
Khandwala, Hasnain
Abdel-Salam, Suzan
Aronson, Ronnie - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aims: To compare patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes in patients who initiated dulaglutide or liraglutide as part of usual clinical therapy. Methods: This observational study enrolled adults with type 2 diabetes who initiated dulaglutide or liraglutide between April 2017 and January 2018. A prospective patient cohort completed questionnaires at baseline and at their usual follow-up visit three to six months later. Clinical outcomes were assessed in a post-hoc retrospective analysis using propensity score matching. Results: In the per-protocol analysis, 146 dulaglutide and 79 liraglutide patients had similar significant improvements in diabetes treatment satisfaction scores (dulaglutide 9.6 ± 1.1, p < 0.001; liraglutide 10.6 ± 1.4, p < 0.001) and follow-up scores for diabetes device satisfaction. Only dulaglutide had significant improvements in medication adherence scores. In the overall cohort, 754 matched patients showed similar reductions in A1C (dulaglutide −0.8% [9 mmol/mol]; liraglutide −0.7% [8 mmol/mol]). Liraglutide patients had a greater reduction in weight than those initiating dulaglutide (−2.8 kg vs. −1.8 kg; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients who initiated dulaglutide or liraglutide in a real-world specialist practice had similar improvements in diabetes medication satisfaction and diabetes device satisfaction. Only dulaglutide patients had significant improvements in medication adherence scores. Both treatment cohorts had similar patternsAbstract: Aims: To compare patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes in patients who initiated dulaglutide or liraglutide as part of usual clinical therapy. Methods: This observational study enrolled adults with type 2 diabetes who initiated dulaglutide or liraglutide between April 2017 and January 2018. A prospective patient cohort completed questionnaires at baseline and at their usual follow-up visit three to six months later. Clinical outcomes were assessed in a post-hoc retrospective analysis using propensity score matching. Results: In the per-protocol analysis, 146 dulaglutide and 79 liraglutide patients had similar significant improvements in diabetes treatment satisfaction scores (dulaglutide 9.6 ± 1.1, p < 0.001; liraglutide 10.6 ± 1.4, p < 0.001) and follow-up scores for diabetes device satisfaction. Only dulaglutide had significant improvements in medication adherence scores. In the overall cohort, 754 matched patients showed similar reductions in A1C (dulaglutide −0.8% [9 mmol/mol]; liraglutide −0.7% [8 mmol/mol]). Liraglutide patients had a greater reduction in weight than those initiating dulaglutide (−2.8 kg vs. −1.8 kg; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients who initiated dulaglutide or liraglutide in a real-world specialist practice had similar improvements in diabetes medication satisfaction and diabetes device satisfaction. Only dulaglutide patients had significant improvements in medication adherence scores. Both treatment cohorts had similar patterns of A1C change, and liraglutide had significantly greater weight loss, which are similar to findings from clinical trials. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Diabetes research and clinical practice. Volume 156(2019)
- Journal:
- Diabetes research and clinical practice
- Issue:
- Volume 156(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 156, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 156
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0156-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10
- Subjects:
- Type 2 diabetes -- Patient reported outcomes -- Dulaglutide -- Liraglutid -- Registry analysis
Diabetes -- Periodicals
Diabetes Mellitus -- Periodicals
616.462 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01688227 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01688227 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01688227 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01688227 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107820 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0168-8227
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3579.603700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12093.xml