The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema. Issue 13 (June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kouritas, Vasileios; Milton, Richard; Kefaloyannis, Emmanouel; Papagiannopoulos, Kostas; Brunelli, Allesandro; Dimov, Doytchin; Karthik, Sishik; Hardy, Andrew; Tcherveniakov, Peter; Chaudhuri, Nilanjan
• Is Part Of: Clinical medicine insights. Issue 13(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-06
• Subjects: emphysema -- LVRS -- EBV -- MDT; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Blood Circulation; Respiration; Lung Diseases; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases; Respiratory organs -- Diseases; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.1005
• DOI: 10.1177/1179548419852063
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1179-5484

Abstract

Background: The emphysema interventional treatment involves mainly lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and endobronchial valve (EBV) implantation. Few institutes discuss these cases at a dedicated emphysema multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting. Objectives: To investigate the impact of a newly established dedicated emphysema MDT meeting on the interventional treatment of such patients. Methods: During a study period of 4 years, the outcome of 44 patients who underwent intervention according to the proposal of the emphysema MDT (group A) was compared with the outcome of 44 propensity score matched patients (group B) treated without the emphysema MDT proposal. Results: More LVRS and less EBV insertions were performed in group A ( P = .009). In group B, the interventions were performed sooner than in group A ( P = .003). Postoperative overall morbidity and length of in-hospital stay were similar in the 2 groups ( P = .918 and .758, respectively). Improvement of breathing ability was reported in more patients from group A ( P = .012). In group B, the total number of re-interventions was higher ( P = .001) and the time to re-intervention had the tendency to be less ( P = .069). Survival was similar between the 2 groups ( P = .884). Intervention without discussion at the MDT and EBV as initial intervention was an independent predictor of re-intervention. Conclusions: Interventional treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after discussion at a dedicated MDT involved more LVRS performed, required fewer interventions for their disease, and had longer re-intervention-free intervals and better breathing improvement.