Pilot study evaluating a non-titrating, weight-based anticoagulation scheme for patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. (January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Pilot study evaluating a non-titrating, weight-based anticoagulation scheme for patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. (January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Pilot study evaluating a non-titrating, weight-based anticoagulation scheme for patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- Authors:
- Deatrick, Kristopher B
Galvagno, Samuel M
Mazzeffi, Michael A
Kaczoroswki, David J
Herr, Daniel L
Rector, Raymond
Hochberg, Eric
Rabinowitz, Ronald P
Scalea, Thomas M
Menaker, Jay - Abstract:
- Objective: There is no universally accepted algorithm for anticoagulation in patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare a non-titrating weight-based heparin infusion to that of a standard titration algorithm. Methods: We performed a prospective randomized non-blinded study of patients: Arm 1—standard practice of titrating heparin to activated partial thromboplastin times goal of 45-55 seconds, and Arm 2—a non-titrating weight-based (10 units/kg/h) infusion. Primary outcome was need for oxygenator/circuit changes. Secondary outcomes included differences in hemolysis and bleeding episodes. Descriptive statistics were performed for the continuous data, and primary and secondary outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Results: Six patients were randomized to Arm 1 and four to Arm 2. There was no difference in age, pH, Pa O2 /Fi O2 ratio, peak inspiratory pressure, positive end expiratory pressure, mean airway pressure at time of cannulation, time on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or survival to hospital discharge in the two arms. Arm 1 had a statistically higher median activated partial thromboplastin times (48 (43, 52) vs 38 (35, 42), p < 0.008) and lower LDH (808 units/L (727, 1112) vs 940 units/L (809, 1137), p = 0.02) than Arm 2. There was no difference in plasma hemoglobin (4.3 (2.5, 8.7) vs 4.3 (3.0, 7.3), p = 0.65) between the two arms. There was no difference in meanObjective: There is no universally accepted algorithm for anticoagulation in patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare a non-titrating weight-based heparin infusion to that of a standard titration algorithm. Methods: We performed a prospective randomized non-blinded study of patients: Arm 1—standard practice of titrating heparin to activated partial thromboplastin times goal of 45-55 seconds, and Arm 2—a non-titrating weight-based (10 units/kg/h) infusion. Primary outcome was need for oxygenator/circuit changes. Secondary outcomes included differences in hemolysis and bleeding episodes. Descriptive statistics were performed for the continuous data, and primary and secondary outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Results: Six patients were randomized to Arm 1 and four to Arm 2. There was no difference in age, pH, Pa O2 /Fi O2 ratio, peak inspiratory pressure, positive end expiratory pressure, mean airway pressure at time of cannulation, time on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or survival to hospital discharge in the two arms. Arm 1 had a statistically higher median activated partial thromboplastin times (48 (43, 52) vs 38 (35, 42), p < 0.008) and lower LDH (808 units/L (727, 1112) vs 940 units/L (809, 1137), p = 0.02) than Arm 2. There was no difference in plasma hemoglobin (4.3 (2.5, 8.7) vs 4.3 (3.0, 7.3), p = 0.65) between the two arms. There was no difference in mean oxygenator/circuit change, transfused packed red blood cell, or documented bleeding complications per patient in each arm (p = 0.56, 0.43, 0.77, respectively). Conclusion: In this pilot study, a non-titrating, weight-based heparin infusion appears safe and as effective in preventing veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit thrombotic complications as compared to a titration algorithm. Larger studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Perfusion. Volume 35:Number 1(2020)
- Journal:
- Perfusion
- Issue:
- Volume 35:Number 1(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 35, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0035-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 13
- Page End:
- 18
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01
- Subjects:
- anticoagulation -- VV ECMO -- veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation -- weight-based -- heparin infusion
Perfusion (Physiology) -- Periodicals
Blood -- Circulation, Artificial -- Periodicals
Heart -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Extracorporeal Circulation -- Periodicals
Perfusion -- Periodicals
Circulation extracorporelle -- Périodiques
Perfusion -- Périodiques
617.41 - Journal URLs:
- http://prf.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0267659119850024 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0267-6591
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12079.xml