Summary statistic analyses can mistake confounding bias for heritability. Issue 8 (20th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Holmes, John B.; Speed, Doug; Balding, David J.
• Is Part Of: Genetic epidemiology. Volume 43:Issue 8(2019)
• Page Start: 930
• Page End: 940
• Publication Date: 2019-09-20
• Subjects: GWAS -- heritability estimation -- misspecified models; Genetic epidemiology -- Periodicals; Heredity -- Periodicals; Medical geography -- Periodicals; 614
• DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22259
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0741-0395

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Linkage disequilibrium SCore regression (LDSC) has become a popular approach to estimate confounding bias, heritability, and genetic correlation using only genome‐wide association study (GWAS) test statistics. SumHer is a newly introduced alternative with similar aims. We show using theory and simulations that both approaches fail to adequately account for confounding bias, even when the assumed heritability model is correct. Consequently, these methods may estimate heritability poorly if there was an inadequate adjustment for confounding in the original GWAS analysis. We also show that the choice of a summary statistic for use in LDSC or SumHer can have a large impact on resulting inferences. Further, covariate adjustments in the original GWAS can alter the target of heritability estimation, which can be problematic for test statistics from a meta‐analysis of GWAS with different covariate adjustments.