Metabolomic Markers of the Relationship Between Sugar-sweetened Beverage Intake and Metabolic Risk in Mexican Adolescents (P08-132-19). (24th October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Metabolomic Markers of the Relationship Between Sugar-sweetened Beverage Intake and Metabolic Risk in Mexican Adolescents (P08-132-19). (24th October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Metabolomic Markers of the Relationship Between Sugar-sweetened Beverage Intake and Metabolic Risk in Mexican Adolescents (P08-132-19)
- Authors:
- Perng, Wei
Tang, Lu
Perng, Wei Perng3 Wei
Perng, Wei
Cantoral, Alejandra
Peterson, Karen - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: To identify metabolites that mark the relationship of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake with adiposity and metabolic risk among boys ( n = 114) and girls ( n = 128) 8–14 years of age. Methods: First, we used linear regression to examine associations of quartiles of SSB intake with adiposity, glycemia, lipid profile, and blood pressure (BP). Next, we used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), a multivariate dimension reduction technique, regression to identify SSB-associated metabolites from a dataset of 938 compounds assayed on an untargeted platform. Finally, we investigated whether the SSB-associated metabolites are also associated with adiposity and metabolic risk. We conducted analyses separately for boys and girls, and accounted for age and pubertal status in all models. Results: Median frequency of SSB intake in this population was 2–4 times per week, with the majority of children consuming sweetened fruit juice or sugar water. In girls, higher SSB intake corresponded with marginally higher BP (Q4 vs. Q1 SSB intake: β = 4.65, 95% CI: −0.22, 9.53 mmHg SBP, P -trend = 0.07). In boys, SSB intake was associated with higher C-peptide (Q4 vs. Q1 SSB intake: β = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.27 ng/mL; P -trend = 0.04), C-peptide based insulin resistance (Q4 vs. Q1 SSB intake: β = 0.17, 95 CI: 0.04, 0.30 ng/mL; P -trend = 0.03), and leptin (Q4 vs. Q1 SSB intake: β = 3.78, 95% CI: 0.49, 7.08 ng/mL; P -trend = 0.02). We identified 6 namedAbstract: Objectives: To identify metabolites that mark the relationship of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake with adiposity and metabolic risk among boys ( n = 114) and girls ( n = 128) 8–14 years of age. Methods: First, we used linear regression to examine associations of quartiles of SSB intake with adiposity, glycemia, lipid profile, and blood pressure (BP). Next, we used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), a multivariate dimension reduction technique, regression to identify SSB-associated metabolites from a dataset of 938 compounds assayed on an untargeted platform. Finally, we investigated whether the SSB-associated metabolites are also associated with adiposity and metabolic risk. We conducted analyses separately for boys and girls, and accounted for age and pubertal status in all models. Results: Median frequency of SSB intake in this population was 2–4 times per week, with the majority of children consuming sweetened fruit juice or sugar water. In girls, higher SSB intake corresponded with marginally higher BP (Q4 vs. Q1 SSB intake: β = 4.65, 95% CI: −0.22, 9.53 mmHg SBP, P -trend = 0.07). In boys, SSB intake was associated with higher C-peptide (Q4 vs. Q1 SSB intake: β = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.27 ng/mL; P -trend = 0.04), C-peptide based insulin resistance (Q4 vs. Q1 SSB intake: β = 0.17, 95 CI: 0.04, 0.30 ng/mL; P -trend = 0.03), and leptin (Q4 vs. Q1 SSB intake: β = 3.78, 95% CI: 0.49, 7.08 ng/mL; P -trend = 0.02). We identified 6 named metabolites in girls (5-methyl-tetrohydroflouride (5-THF), phenylephrine, urate, nonanoate, deoxyuridine, and sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) and 3 named metabolites in boys (2-piperidinone, octanoylcarnitine, catechol) correlated with SSB intake. In girls, urate and nonanoate marked the relationship of SSB intake with blood pressure Conclusions: Urate and nonanoate may mark the association of SSB intake with higher BP in peripubertal girls. Future prospective studies are required to confirm our findings. Funding Sources: P01ES022844 from the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS); RD83543601 from the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Michigan Nutrition Obesity Research Center (P30 DK089503) and Michigan Regional Comprehensive Metabolomics Resource Core (R24 DK097153); the Robert C. and Veronica Atkins Foundation. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Current developments in nutrition. Volume 3(2019)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Current developments in nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 3(2019)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 3, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0003-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10-24
- Subjects:
- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Nutrition
Periodicals
Periodicals
Fulltext
Internet Resources
Periodicals
612.3 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/cdn ↗
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/current-developments-in-nutrition ↗
https://cdn.nutrition.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/cdn/nzz044.P08-132-19 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2475-2991
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12021.xml