Age and Sex Estimation Using Artificial Intelligence From Standard 12-Lead ECGs. (September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Attia, Zachi I.; Friedman, Paul A.; Noseworthy, Peter A.; Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco; Ladewig, Dorothy J.; Satam, Gaurav; Pellikka, Patricia A.; Munger, Thomas M.; Asirvatham, Samuel J.; Scott, Christopher G.; Carter, Rickey E.; Kapa, Suraj
• Is Part Of: Circulation. Volume 12:Number 9(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-09
• Subjects: artificial intelligence -- coronary disease -- electrocardiography -- hypertension -- neural network; Arrhythmia -- Periodicals; Heart -- Electric properties -- Periodicals; 616.128
• DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007284
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1941-3149

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Sex and age have long been known to affect the ECG. Several biologic variables and anatomic factors may contribute to sex and age-related differences on the ECG. We hypothesized that a convolutional neural network (CNN) could be trained through a process called deep learning to predict a person's age and self-reported sex using only 12-lead ECG signals. We further hypothesized that discrepancies between CNN-predicted age and chronological age may serve as a physiological measure of health. Methods: We trained CNNs using 10-second samples of 12-lead ECG signals from 499 727 patients to predict sex and age. The networks were tested on a separate cohort of 275 056 patients. Subsequently, 100 randomly selected patients with multiple ECGs over the course of decades were identified to assess within-individual accuracy of CNN age estimation. Results: Of 275 056 patients tested, 52% were males and mean age was 58.6±16.2 years. For sex classification, the model obtained 90.4% classification accuracy with an area under the curve of 0.97 in the independent test data. Age was estimated as a continuous variable with an average error of 6.9±5.6 years (R-squared =0.7). Among 100 patients with multiple ECGs over the course of at least 2 decades of life, most patients (51%) had an average error between real age and CNN-predicted age of <7 years. Major factors seen among patients with a CNN-predicted age that exceeded chronologic age by >7 years included: low ejection fraction, hypertension, and coronary disease ( P <0.01). In the 27% of patients where correlation was >0.8 between CNN-predicted and chronologic age, no incident events occurred over follow-up (33±12 years). Conclusions: Applying artificial intelligence to the ECG allows prediction of patient sex and estimation of age. The ability of an artificial intelligence algorithm to determine physiological age, with further validation, may serve as a measure of overall health. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.