Limitations and Precautions in the Use of the Farnsworth-Munsell Dichotomous D-15 Test. Issue 9 (September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Limitations and Precautions in the Use of the Farnsworth-Munsell Dichotomous D-15 Test. Issue 9 (September 2019)
- Main Title:
- Limitations and Precautions in the Use of the Farnsworth-Munsell Dichotomous D-15 Test
- Authors:
- Dain, Stephen J.
Atchison, David A.
Hovis, Jeffery K. - Abstract:
- Abstract : SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians who administer the Farnsworth-Munsell D-15 test need to pay attention to the quality and quantity of lighting and the time that they allow for completion of the test, and all repeat attempts need to be included in reports on compliance with color vision standards. PURPOSE: The validity of the Farnsworth-Munsell D-15 has been questioned because practice may allow significantly color vision–deficient subjects to pass. In this article, we review the influence of practice and other factors that may affect the performance. These relate to both the design and the administration of the test. METHODS: We review the literature and present some calculations on limitations in the colorimetric design of the test, quantity and quality of lighting, time taken, and repeat attempts. RESULTS: In addition to the review of the literature, color differences and luminance differences under selected sources are calculated, and the increases in luminance clues under some sources and for protanopes are illustrated. CONCLUSIONS: All these factors affect the outcome of the test and need specification and implementation if the test is to be applied consistently and equitably. We recommend the following: practitioners should never rely on a single color vision test regardless of the color vision standard; lighting should be T cp ′′ 6500 K and R a > 90; illuminance levels should be between 200 and 300 lux if detection of color vision deficiency is a priority orAbstract : SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians who administer the Farnsworth-Munsell D-15 test need to pay attention to the quality and quantity of lighting and the time that they allow for completion of the test, and all repeat attempts need to be included in reports on compliance with color vision standards. PURPOSE: The validity of the Farnsworth-Munsell D-15 has been questioned because practice may allow significantly color vision–deficient subjects to pass. In this article, we review the influence of practice and other factors that may affect the performance. These relate to both the design and the administration of the test. METHODS: We review the literature and present some calculations on limitations in the colorimetric design of the test, quantity and quality of lighting, time taken, and repeat attempts. RESULTS: In addition to the review of the literature, color differences and luminance differences under selected sources are calculated, and the increases in luminance clues under some sources and for protanopes are illustrated. CONCLUSIONS: All these factors affect the outcome of the test and need specification and implementation if the test is to be applied consistently and equitably. We recommend the following: practitioners should never rely on a single color vision test regardless of the color vision standard; lighting should be T cp ′′ 6500 K and R a > 90; illuminance levels should be between 200 and 300 lux if detection of color vision deficiency is a priority or between 300 and 1000 lux if the need is to test at the level where illuminance has minimal influence on performance; illuminance should be reported; time limits should be set between 1 and 2 minutes; repeat testing (beyond the specified test and one retest) should be carried out only with authorization; and initial and repeated results should be reported. A set of test instructions to assist in the consistent application of the test is provided in the Appendix. Abstract : Supplemental digital content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Optometry and vision science. Volume 96:Issue 9(2019)
- Journal:
- Optometry and vision science
- Issue:
- Volume 96:Issue 9(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 96, Issue 9 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 96
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0096-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09
- Subjects:
- Optometry -- Periodicals
Physiological optics -- Periodicals
Vision disorders -- Periodicals
617.7505 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00006324-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.optvissci.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001420 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1040-5488
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6276.450000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12017.xml