A first case report of primary epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma-like renal tumor showing a perivascular pseudorosette-like pattern: Description of morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features. Issue 39 (September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Qiuyao; Mou, Zheng; Yang, Kun; Jiang, Huifeng
• Other Names: NA. section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 98:Issue 39(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-09
• Subjects: genetic analysis -- immunohistochemistry -- perivascular pseudorosette-like growth pattern -- primary epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma-like tumor; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017245
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Rationale: Over the past decade, although several new entities of renal tumors have emerged, a form of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that morphologically resembles epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma has not been reported thus far. Herein, we describe a case of an unusual renal tumor that remained unclassified under a current RCC subtype, and briefly present its morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features. Patient concerns: The patient was an 85-year-old man who presented with hematuria and flank pain. Imaging studies revealed a left renal mass without enlarged lymph nodes. There were no abnormal masses or nodules in other organs. Diagnoses: The patient underwent no other treatment except the left radical nephrectomy under a clinical diagnosis of invasive urothelial carcinoma and was discharged on the thirteenth day. Histologically, the renal tumor showed biphasic proliferation of epithelial (strongly cytokeratin-positive; P63, P40, and vimentin-negative) and myoepithelial (strongly vimentin-positive; focal P63 and P40-positive; and weakly cytokeratin-positive) cells arranged in a perivascular pseudorosette-like pattern. No mutations were detected in multiple gene tests. According to the pathological structure, the patient was diagnosed as primary epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma-like renal tumor. Interventions: To the best of our knowledge, the present tumor has not been previously described, and thus, this variant has not been integrated into a known form of PCC. Therefore, we cannot diagnose this type of tumor with other types of kidney tumors. Outcomes: Three years after primary diagnosis, the patient died of multiple organ failure result from multiple distant metastases. Lessons: We present the first case of carcinoma of the kidney with EMC-like features and a perivascular pseudorosette-like growth pattern. Clinicians should be aware of the features of this uncommon variant of RCC to avoid diagnostic delays or misdiagnosis and prevent unnecessary or inappropriate treatment.