An AHP-ELECTRE framework to evaluate barriers to green supply chain management in the leather industry. Issue 8 (17th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Uddin, S.; Ali, S. M.; Kabir, G.; Suhi, S. A.; Enayet, R.; Haque, T.
• Is Part Of: International journal of sustainable development and world ecology. Volume 26:Issue 8(2019)
• Page Start: 732
• Page End: 751
• Publication Date: 2019-11-17
• Subjects: Green supply chain management -- analytic hierarchy process -- ELECTRE-I -- barrier analysis -- leather industry -- sensitivity analysis; Sustainable development -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Economic development -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Ecologie; Duurzame ontwikkeling; Ecology; Economic development -- Environmental aspects; Sustainable development; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 338.72
• DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2019.1661044
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1745-2627

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The leather-processing industry (LPI) is constantly polluting the environment in Bangladesh. As a result, stakeholders are continuously pressurizing managers working in LPI to embrace green leather-processing activities. Thus, the green concept is attracting significant attention from managers in the Bangladeshi LPI. However, the industry is struggling with many barriers to implementing green supply chain management (GSCM). There are many studies regarding barriers to GSCM. However, those studies failed to show the possible pathways to implement GSCM. This study addresses the gap by evaluating barriers to GSCM considering effective pathways to GSCM. In this study, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is integrated with Elimination Et Choix Traduisant La Realite (ELECTRE-I) method to identify and prioritize the barriers and to rank the possible pathways to implementing GSCM in the leather industry. To accredit the proposed framework, it is implemented on a leather-processing factory in Bangladesh. A sensitivity analysis is performed to inspect the strength of the outcome of this method. The outcome of this study indicates that the high cost of advanced technology is the most important barrier to implement GSCM while green technology and techniques are the most effective pathways to GSCM. The findings of this research will support researchers and practitioners by giving insights on barriers and possible pathways to implementing GSCM.