Incidence and Time of Onset of Osseous Pseudoprogression in Patients With Metastatic Spine Disease From Renal Cell or Prostate Carcinoma After Treatment With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Issue 3 (29th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jabehdar Maralani, Pejman; Winger, Kathleen; Symons, Sean; Machnowska, Matylda; Heyn, Chinthaka; Helmi, Ali; Chan, Aimee; Tseng, Chia-Lin; Sahgal, Arjun
• Is Part Of: Neurosurgery. Volume 84:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 647
• Page End: 654
• Publication Date: 2018-03-29
• Subjects: Prostate carcinoma -- Pseudoprogression -- Renal cell carcinoma -- Stereotactic body radiation therapy; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.48005
• DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy075
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-396X

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Tumor osseous pseudoprogression (PP), defined as an imaging-based transient increase in tumor size following treatment, was recently described in patients with spinal metastases following stereotactic body radiation therapy. Distinguishing PP from true tumor progression is critical. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence, time of onset, and time range of PP following stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients treated for spinal metastases from either prostate cancer (PC) or renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and associated predictive factors. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on our institution's cancer database from 2009 to 2015. Selection was based on single level, no prior radiation or surgery, ≥2 follow-up spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and metastases arising from either PC or RCC. Gross tumor volume was contoured on pre- and up to 5 posttreatment MRIs. Patients were sorted into groups depending on gross tumor volume response: PP, non-PP, or progressive disease. Clinical and dosimetric variables were compared using either Fisher's exact test or Kruskal–Wallis analyses. RESULTS: Forty-three spinal segments from 31 patients were analyzed. RCC and PC patients showed similar incidence of PP (∼37%). Whether the primary was lytic or sclerotic was a significant predictive factor with more PP in the lytic group ( P = .0208). There was a trend of earlier PP onset in RCC (within 6-18 mo) as compared to PC; however, PC segments showed more time-confined presentation of PP (9-12 mo). CONCLUSION: There was a higher incidence of PP in lytic compared to sclerotic primary tumor type. PP in spinal metastatic sites may have variable presentations depending on the primary cancer.