Assessment of Human-to-Human Transmissibility of Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus Across 5 Waves by Analyzing Clusters of Case Patients in Mainland China, 2013–2017. (29th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Xiling; Wu, Peng; Pei, Yao; Tsang, Tim K; Gu, Dantong; Wang, Wei; Zhang, Juanjuan; Horby, Peter W; Uyeki, Timothy M; Cowling, Benjamin J; Yu, Hongjie
• Is Part Of: Clinical infectious diseases. Volume 68:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: 623
• Page End: 631
• Publication Date: 2018-06-29
• Subjects: influenza A(H7N9) -- cluster -- human-to-human transmissibility -- genetic susceptibility; Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; 616.905
• DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy541
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1058-4838

Abstract

Abstract : Human-to-human transmission risk of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus has not changed over time and remains limited to date, although the highly-pathogenic avian influenza A(H7N9) virus emerged and the number of human cases increased dramatically during the 2016–17 epidemic wave. Abstract: Background: The 2016–17 epidemic of human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus was alarming, due to the surge in reported cases across a wide geographic area and the emergence of highly-pathogenic A(H7N9) viruses. Our study aimed to assess whether the human-to-human transmission risk of A(H7N9) virus has changed across the 5 waves since 2013. Methods: Data on human cases and clusters of A(H7N9) virus infection were collected from the World Health Organization, open access national and provincial reports, informal online sources, and published literature. We compared the epidemiological characteristics of sporadic and cluster cases, estimated the relative risk ( RR ) of infection in blood relatives and non–blood relatives, and estimated the bounds on the effective reproductive number ( R e ) across waves from 2013 through September 2017. Results: We identified 40 human clusters of A(H7N9) virus infection, with a median cluster size of 2 (range 2–3). The overall RR of infection in blood relatives versus non–blood relatives was 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88, 3.09), and was not significantly different across waves (χ 2 = 2.66, P = .617). The upper limit of R e for A(H7N9) virus was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.14) and was not significantly different across waves (χ 2 = 1.52, P = .822). Conclusions: The small cluster size and low R e suggest that human-to-human transmissibility of A(H7N9) virus has not changed over time and remains limited to date. Continuous assessment of A(H7N9) virus infections and human case clusters is of crucial importance for public health.