The Role of Intravenous Contrast Agent in the Sonographic Assessment of Crohn's Disease Activity: Is Contrast Agent Injection Necessary?. (8th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ripollés, Tomás; Martínez-Pérez, María Jesús; Paredes, José María; Vizuete, José; Martin, Gregorio
• Is Part Of: Journal of Crohn's and colitis. Volume 13:Number 5(2019)
• Page Start: 585
• Page End: 592
• Publication Date: 2018-12-08
• Subjects: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound -- colour Doppler imaging -- inflammatory bowel disease -- Crohn's disease; Inflammatory bowel diseases -- Periodicals; 616.344005
• DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy204
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1873-9946

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aims: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound [CEUS] is reported to be superior to wall thickness or colour Doppler imaging [CDI] in predicting disease activity using endoscopy as the reference standard. Our aims were to determine in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] whether the evaluation of wall thickness or CDI before CEUS examination could help to decide when the injection of contrast agent is justified as a means for detecting disease activity as determined at endoscopy, without reducing the accuracy of ultrasound. Methods: In total, 180 patients with CD underwent both colonoscopy and ultrasound, including mural thickness, CDI and CEUS evaluation, prospectively as part of clinical care. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to determine the area under the curve and the best cutoff of wall thickness and ultrasound enhancement value to discriminate between endoscopically active and inactive disease. Several analyses were carried out to determine which parameter or combination of parameters best detected endoscopic activity. Results: Comparative evaluation of the different analysis showed that wall thickness alone classified 76.6% of patients correctly, CDI alone 72.7%, and thickness plus CDI 72.2%. The use of CEUS significantly improved the diagnosis of active disease: CEUS alone correctly classified 164 of 180 patients [91.1%], combined analysis of CDI and CEUS 165 of 180 [91.7%], and combined analysis of thickness, CDI and CEUS 164 of 180 [91.1%], without significant differences. Patients with CDI grade 2 or 3 showed a predictive positive value of 97% to detect disease activity, similar to CEUS [100%]. Conclusion: CEUS is the most reliable ultrasound criterion for endoscopic disease activity. However, the use of a contrast agent is probably not justified to assess disease activity for patients with CDI grade 2/3.