Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging versus Conventional Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Benign Hepatic Nodules. (17th July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jia, Yingmei; Cai, Huasong; Wang, Meng; Luo, Yanji; Xu, Ling; Dong, Zhi; Yan, Xu; Li, Zi-Ping; Feng, Shi-Ting
• Other Names: Filippi Luca Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Contrast media & molecular imaging. Volume 2019(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-07-17
• Subjects: Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals; Contrast media (Diagnostic imaging) -- Periodicals; Contrast Media -- Periodicals; Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals; Substances de contraste -- Périodiques; Diagnostics moléculaires -- Périodiques; Imagerie médicale; Substance de contraste; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.0754
• DOI: 10.1155/2019/2030147
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1555-4309

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives . To assess the efficacy of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and compare DKI-derived parameters with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from benign hepatic nodules including focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), hemangioma, and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA). Materials and Methods . 151 patients with 182 hepatic nodules (114 HCCs and 68 benign nodules including 33 FNHs, 29 hemangiomas, and 6 HCAs) were analyzed. Preoperative MRI examinations including DKI ( b values: 0, 200, 500, 800, 1500, and 2000 sec/mm 2 ) were performed, and kurtosis ( K ), diffusivity ( D ), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated. The efficacy of DKI-derived parameters K, D, and ADC for distinguishing HCC from these benign nodules was analyzed. Results . ROC (receiver operating characteristic curve) analysis showed the optimal cutoff values of ADC, D, and K for identification of these benign nodules, and HCCs were 1.295 (area under the curve (AUC): 0.826; sensitivity 80.6%; specificity 70.8%), 1.787 (AUC: 0.770; sensitivity 83.6%; specificity 59.6%), and 1.002 (AUC: 0.761; sensitivity 65.5%; specificity 79.0%), respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in ADC, D, and K values between groups of HCC-FNH and HCC-hemangioma (P < 0.05 ). There were significant differences in K and ADC values between groups of FNH-hemangioma and HCA-hemangioma (P < 0.05 ), respectively. Using logistic regression analysis, a regression equation was obtained:Logit P = − 1.982 X 1 + 1.385 X 3 + 1.948 ( X 1 : ADC; X 3 : K ), and odds ratios (OR) were 0.138 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.052, 0.367), and 8.996 (95% CI: 0.970, 16.460), respectively. Conclusion . Both ADC value and DKI-derived parameters K and D values have demonstrated a higher preoperative efficacy in distinguishing HCC from FNH, hemangioma, and HCA. No evidence was shown to suggest D or K value was superior to the ADC value.